Westminster Legal Policy Forum

This conference discussed the future for legal technology and innovation in legal services in the UK and the use of artificial intelligence moving forward.

It brought key stakeholders together with regulators and policymakers to assess implications for legal firms and their customers of the growing use of AI and other technological innovations in legal practice.

Delegates examined key regulatory and ethical issues, against the backdrop of implementation of the EU AI Act and the new Government’s plans for regulation affecting companies developing powerful AI models, to be overseen by the new Regulatory Innovation Office, as well as recommendations for raising AI uptake across sectors in DSIT’s upcoming AI Opportunities Action Plan. Delegates also considered the impact of the Data (Use and Access) Bill currently progressing through Parliament, with proposals to introduce changes to data protection law, particularly on the use of AI-generated decision-making.

The agenda included a focus on latest thinking on opportunities for service improvement and increasing productivity, and how they can be realised for legal service providers of all sizes. The discussion took place in light of the Government’s recently published Invest 2035: The UK’s modern industrial strategy, including plans to expand the global market for the UK’s professional services by capitalising on emerging strengths, such as accounting and lawtech.

Sessions discussed practical challenges and regulatory implications of the latest developments in AI in legal tech and services. Areas for discussion included AI-driven contract analysis, predictive legal outcomes, the use of blockchains, and wider application of generative AI and machine learning.

With the EU AI Act now in force, delegates explored implications of its tiered obligations for the UK lawtech industry and how legal services in the UK might be affected, including the shape of future alignment with EU and wider international policy.

They discussed technical and business process integration, including strategies and best practice for workforce professional development and upskilling, as well as addressing concerns regarding potential negative impact on employment and progression. Areas for discussion included addressing tech skills gaps, tackling resistance to change, and considering the role of regulation, education and training providers in ensuring that legal professionals are competent in the use of new technologies.

Further sessions looked at data security priorities, safeguarding client confidentiality and accuracy in AI-driven legal services.

Key considerations for regulators and development of the lawtech market were also examined. Discussion drew on the Legal Services Board’s update on its approach to regulating the use of AI, including proposals for the role of tech in improving access to legal services alongside protection of vulnerable groups, and creating a more open market for innovators and tech providers. We also expected discussion on the role of the newly-launched Regulatory Innovation Office.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote contributions from the LSB’s Director of Regulation and Policy, Richard Orpin; as well as from Christina Blacklaws, Chair, LawtechUK; Harry Borovick, General Counsel, Luminance; and Author, AI and the Law: A Practical Guide to Using Artificial Intelligence Safely; Aileen Armstrong, Executive Director, Strategy, Innovation and External Affairs, SRA; Jenifer Swallow, Strategic Advisor and Director, Jenifer Swallow International; and former CEO, LawtechUK; Gregoire Miot, President, European Legal Technology Association; and Ian Jeffery, CEO, The Law Society.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from MOJ; GLD; HMCTS; HM Treasury; CPS; NCA; HMRC; DBT; DSIT; Defra; DESNZ; MHCLG; DfT; Ofcom; Home Office; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference looked at next steps for tackling modern slavery and the future direction for policy under the new Government.

Areas for discussion included priorities for identifying and supporting vulnerable workers, as well as improving multi-agency coordination and overall response to modern slavery.

With statistics published by the Home Office indicating a record high of 16,996 reported cases in 2023 and the Government recently pledging to recruit 200 extra staff to tackle a backlog of modern slavery cases, stakeholders and policymakers assessed the effectiveness of the National Referral Mechanism framework for identifying victims of modern slavery, including the way forward for addressing challenges with victim referral.

Delegates also looked at the role of the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner and their recent policy brief on tackling sexual exploitation and supporting female victims of modern slavery, options for future legislation and regulation, and improving data and intelligence sharing, as well as key issues emerging from the recent report published by the House of Lords inquiry into the Modern Slavery Act 2015 which found that the UK is falling behind in its response to modern slavery and its support for victims.

Stakeholders and policymakers discussed the Committee’s recommendations, including to separate reporting channels between immigration and exploitation related to employment, as well as considering the Committee’s concerns surrounding the changes in the rhetoric used by the last Government regarding the relationship between immigration and modern slavery, and its impact on survivor support and the infrastructure established by the Modern Slavery Act 2015.

Sessions in the agenda discussed priorities for improving the engagement and response of commercial organisations and public authorities, as well as how compliance and effective tackling of modern slavery in supply chains can be strengthened, including options for improving supply chain oversight.

With the new EU Directive on corporate sustainability due diligence coming into force in July, mandating companies to identify and address human rights impacts within and outside the EU, delegates and stakeholders considered practicalities and best practice in proactive safeguarding and human rights measures within corporate operations, as well as how new measures will impact UK businesses’ supply chain partners. It also came with the new consultation launched by DHSC on proposals to legally require NHS suppliers to mitigate risks of exploitation in their supply chains.

Further sessions explored the way forward for improving responsiveness in public authorities, frontline agencies, businesses and support services, looking at support for victims of modern slavery, including those who enter the UK illegally.

With increased police reports of modern slavery offences and referrals to the National Referral Mechanism, delegates discussed implementation so far of the Serious and Organised Crime Strategy 2023-2028, alongside the National Crime Agency’s own strategy. Delegates looked at latest thinking on disrupting domestic groups, securing the UK border, maximising international cooperation to cut off supply routes, and plans to increase the number of officers dedicated to tackling serious and organised crime in regional policing.

Further sessions examined the UK’s role in tackling modern slavery on an international level, with discussion on existing treaties and frameworks, and areas for further collaboration with key law enforcement partners and human rights bodies.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from both Houses of Parliament and officials from DWP; MOJ; DHSC; UKHSA; CQC; HMPPS; HMRC; Border Force; FCDO; Home Office; ICIBI; NCA; NAO; DBT; DfE; DfT; Ofcom; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined next steps for UK asylum system policy, with a focus on practical considerations for the implementation of proposed reforms to the asylum system and enhancing border security.

It was a timely opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess measures expected in the Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill. Following the Home Secretary’s announcement of increased immigration enforcement over the next six months and the recent appointment of Martin Hewitt to lead the UK's new Border Security Command, we expected discussion on planned measures around detention capacity, specialist recruitment, enforcement and returns, targeting illegal employment, and international collaboration.

Delegates assessed progress and potential impact of the commitment to increase return flights for those who have had their asylum applications rejected and the reopening of immigration removal centres, as well as potential alternatives to the use of detention programmes. The planned increase in powers for law enforcement officers to investigate organised immigration crime was also considered, including implications for law enforcement agencies and their partners.

Further discussion focused on enhancing multi-agency and cross-sector collaboration, including new approaches and frameworks for the care of asylum seekers, alongside how collaboration can best be incentivised, supported and managed going forward to improve system effectiveness. Best practice in effective coordination between legal advice providers, local authorities, education providers and the voluntary sector was also discussed, looking at addressing housing challenges and supporting young refugees, as well as priorities for security and enforcement cooperation with the EU, and options for establishing safer routes into the UK.

The agenda looked at implementation priorities for the Border Security Command and new approaches to collaborative frameworks within the UK, with the EU and more widely internationally. It was a timely opportunity to discuss priorities for international collaboration following the Prime Minister’s trip to Rome to learn from the Italian Government’s approach to dealing with irregular migration. Delegates also considered strategies for the UK’s devolved nations amid reports that Scotland plans to reintroduce free bus travel for asylum seekers and a recent think tank report on enhancing legal services for migrants in Wales.

Amidst continuing concerns surrounding backlogs in the processing of asylum applications, delegates considered priorities for developing efficiency in case management, training, and what is needed to ensure that the system has capacity to clear backlogs.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Daniel Hobbs, Director General, Migration and Borders, Home Office; Vicky Tennant, Representative to the United Kingdom, UNHCR; Jon Featonby, Chief Policy Analyst, Refugee Council; Dr Annette Idler, Associate Professor, Global Security, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford; and Susan Fratzke, Senior Policy Analyst, International Programme, Migration Policy Institute.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from ICIBI; Home Office; MOJ; FCDO; MHCLG; DHSC; HMRC; LAA; DfC, NI; CQC; DWP; DfE; Defra; DSIT; NAO; ONS; Ofcom; Department for the Economy, NI; DCEDIY, ROI; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

The conference assessed next steps for policy and legal practice to better support separating families in England and Wales.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to examine the current system and assess newly integrated initiatives. The conference was also a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss priorities for policy in the new parliament, including the Government’s pledge to strengthen the rights and protections available to women in co-habiting couples. We are pleased that, subject to policy developments, Neal Barcoe, Deputy Director, Family Justice Policy Unit, Ministry of Justice, had joined us for a keynote session.

Taking place following the Budget announcing a rise of £1.9bn over the next two years for the Ministry of Justice, it was an opportunity to discuss priorities for the funding and its potential to be made available for courts and legal aid.

Delegates assessed progress on the aim of increasing transparency and improving public confidence in the courts, including the Transparency Implementation Group (TIG) Reporting Pilot for Family Courts, sponsored by the Judiciary, which has recently been expanded to 16 more courts across England, including private and public cases before magistrates.

The agenda also included a focus on next steps for the laws governing finances in relation to divorce and the ending of civil partnerships, which is expected to be suggested in the Law Commission’s review and scoping report, due for publication later in the year. The report is looking into financial remedies and next steps for the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with the Law Commission from Professor Nick Hopkins.

Attendees discussed the way forward for safeguarding children from harms suffered during family breakdown, including priorities for improving multi-agency working and third sector involvement during the process.

Sessions in the agenda looked at the way forward for child-centred approaches and proceedings, and addressing challenges for those separating in cases of coercive control and domestic abuse, with the Nuffield Foundation’s Fair Shares? report recommending measures to improve processes, as well as highlighting the effect coercive control and domestic abuse have on the allocation of assets. We are also pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Lead Author of the Fair Shares? report, Professor Emma Hitchings.

Strategies for supporting victims were also discussed, exploring innovative approaches such as trauma-informed considerations taken by the courts and the role of mediation in defusing conflict. The conference took place following recent updates in family court reform - reflected in the Private Family Law Early Resolution Consultation published by the previous government - which emphasise children’s well-being and aim to improve access to early legal advice and navigation of the courts.

We expected further discussion to look at priorities for modernisation of the family justice system and supporting the courts in mitigating harm for those going through family breakdown, including delivering effective outcomes, in light of Cafcass setting out new practice requirements for its Family Court Advisers and Children’s Guardians when advising courts on child welfare and best interests in domestic abuse cases. Next steps for professional competence were also discussed, in light of the SRA recently reporting a 25% increase in complaints against family lawyers compared to last year.

With discussion on diverting relevant cases away to ease the backlog facing the family justice system, delegates looked at strategies to enable administrative efficiencies and latest thinking on options for addressing backlogs. Areas for discussion included the use of non-court dispute resolution (NCDR), financial dispute resolution (FDR) appointments, arbitration, mediation and collaborative law efforts, in the context of newly increased powers of courts to encourage and enforce such tools in the Family Procedure Rules that took effect earlier this year.

Further sessions considered the balance between judicial discretion and achieving consistent outcomes, in response to concerns regarding variability in decision-making.

We are pleased to have been able to include further keynote sessions with: His Honour Judge Edward Hess, Lead Judge, London Financial Remedies Court; and James Pirrie, Director, Family Law in Partnership.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons and officials from DfE; HMCTS; MOJ; and NAO.

This conference focused on next steps for leasehold reform in England and Wales.

It came with the Government’s announcement of the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill in the King’s Speech, alongside the Housing Minister’s recent announcements, which included:

• a timetable from January for the implementation of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act passed by the previous Government
• a commitment that Government would announce in the second half of next year how it intends to ban new leaseholds following a consultation
• the publication of a Commonhold white paper next year

With the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act coming into law in May, it was a timely opportunity to discuss the way forward for the implementation of policy measures and implications from the upcoming draft Bill.

Following the recent Government announcements it was a timely opportunity to discuss the way forward for the implementation of policy measures and implications from the upcoming draft Bill.

Delegates also discussed the Law Commission’s recommendations which the Government are aiming to enact. They considered priorities relating to leasehold enfranchisement and the Right to Manage, looking at addressing unregulated and unaffordable ground rents, and removing the threat of forfeiture as a means of ensuring compliance with lease agreements.

Stakeholders and policymakers also examined key outstanding issues and priorities, including stakeholder concerns, for implementation of the Act following the passing of the legislation at the end of the last parliament. There was also discussion on implications of proposals in the Renters’ Rights Bill on leasehold reform such as ending Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions.

There was a focus on practical challenges in enforcing new provisions, such as the process for lease extensions to 990 years and the ban on new leasehold houses, and ensuring transparency in service charges.

Latest thinking on legal and practical barriers to transitioning from leasehold to commonhold were discussed, looking at the framework for the transition period for phasing out leaseholds, compensation mechanisms for freeholders and the role of local authorities. Delegates looked at options for reform of freehold, including strategies for building upon current legislation.

Taking place following the announcement in the Budget of £1bn investment in the housing sector, aiming to speed up remediation of unsafe housing, improve building safety and support future housebuilding, it was an opportunity to discuss priorities for the sector in the context of wider housing policy.

Further sessions discussed dispute resolution in leasehold law, focusing on preparing for changes and improvements in handling disputes to ensure fair and efficient resolutions.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Judge Siobhan McGrath, President, First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), Courts and Tribunals Judiciary; Prof Nicholas Hopkins, Commissioner, Law Commission of England and Wales; Prof Martin Dixon, Director, Cambridge Centre for Property Law, University of Cambridge; and Rob Stevens, Head of Property Risk, Nationwide Building Society.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons and officials from MHCLG; Defra; HMRC; HM Land Registry; GLD; DBT; DESNZ; HMRC; DfT; DfE; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought together policymakers and stakeholders to examine the future for immigration policy in the UK.

It was an early opportunity to consider priorities for policy in the new Parliament, including assessing the new Government’s plans to reduce net migration through reform of the points-based system and the skills system, alongside the introduction of a new Border Security Command, as well as the likely impact of measures in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill announced in the King’s Speech.

The conference took place following the Home Secretary’s announcement of further measures to enforce immigration rules and increase returns, with latest Home Office statistics indicating a decline in immigration numbers.

The agenda included a focus on potential options for reform, and how the immigration system can best be utilised to support the UK labour market. Delegates considered government plans to address skills shortages by upskilling the domestic workforce to reduce employer demand for overseas workers, with discussion on strengthening the Migration Advisory Committee and the creation of Skills England, and introducing new powers to ban hiring from overseas for employers and agencies that break employment law. Recent statistics show a 26% decrease in health and care visa applications.

Sessions also provided an opportunity for delegates to consider potential impacts of the Government’s immigration policies and priorities for tourism and the wider economy, including the Home Office’s announcement that everyone wishing to travel to the UK, except British and Irish citizens, will need permission in advance through an ETA or eVisa.

Delegates discussed key issues and implementation so far of changes to legal migration rules for family and work visas announced by the previous government in December 2023, with restrictions on dependents coming to the UK and increases in the baseline minimum salary to be sponsored for a Skilled Work Visa. They also explored the recent fall in visa applications and its impact on staff and labour shortages, with early indications showing a 27% fall in visa applications overall.

Potential impacts on key sectors, including health and social care, were discussed as well as how they can be addressed.

Further areas for discussion included priorities for tackling labour exploitation, minimising the risk of deception and ensuring workers are fully informed of the nature of their work.

The conference also followed MAC’s Graduate route: rapid review, looking at who is using the route, their activities during and after the route, and its impact on international student numbers and the UK economy. With MAC reporting no evidence of abuse and recommending the continuation of the route, further sessions in the agenda wexplored the future of international student migration, including employment in the UK job market post-graduation.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Philippa Rouse, Director, Migration and Citizenship, and Senior Responsible Officer, Future Border and Immigration System Programme, Home Office; Professor Brian Bell, Chair, Migration Advisory Committee; and Dr Madeleine Sumption, Director, Migration Observatory.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• the UK points-based immigration system:
  
  
  
  • the current system: assessing immigration strategy - recent migration trends - priorities for developing immigration policy to meet long and short-term economic objectives
  • impact: how the points-based system has impacted the economy and user experiences of immigration - impact of the recently reported reduction in approved visas for the health and care sector
  • key issues for future policy: options for reform of the points-based system - what is needed for a joined-up approach to immigration linked to skills needs - approaches to effective development and implementation - involvement of the NCA to target organised immigration crime networks
• international student migration:
  
  
  
  • impact on students: how changes to student visas would impact international students in terms of accessibility and experience of HE
  • post-graduation employment: assessing recent trends and the impact of international students on UK labour markets - how the UK can strike a balance with student migration to support the economy
  • policy: the future of the graduate route following the MAC’s review - options for policy in the new parliament
• UK labour market:
  
  
  
  • labour shortages: assessing the role and effectiveness of the shortage occupation list - priorities for alleviating pressures in sectors such as hospitality, agriculture, and health and social care - exploring the decrease in visa applications for the health and social care sector
  • policy options: what is needed for immigration policy to best tackle labour shortages, including short-term and seasonal work options - government plans to address skills shortages through the creation of Skills England
  • tackling labour exploitation: improving identification, inspection and enforcement capacity - incentivising proactive cooperation from high-risk industries and employers - options for further regulation
  • supporting victims: empowering exploited workers to seek support - considering incentives and drivers behind behaviour
  • impact on businesses: considering the complexity of the system and its impact on user experience and accessibility for SMEs - exploring collaborative frameworks between businesses and government

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from FCDO; ICIBI; Home Office; MAC; NAO; the Executive Office, NI; DWP; DBT; MHCLG; ONS; Defra; DAERA, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DoH, NI; HMRC; DCEDIY, ROI; DFHERIS, ROI; DPENDR, ROI; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine next steps for tackling fraud and financial crime in the UK, including priorities for policy in the new Parliament, particularly in the context of the Government’s pledge to introduce a new expanded fraud strategy. As stakeholders await clarity from the Government on the direction of policy, we expected discussion on key issues and options put forward by interested groups.

It was an opportunity to consider the future for measures in the current Fraud Strategy, legislation such as the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act and APP reimbursement reform from the Payment Systems Regulator, coming into effect in October 2024. We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Head of Policy at the Payment Systems Regulator, Kate Fitzgerald, who updated delegates on the changes planned.

We also expected a focus on recommendations for consumer protection outlined in the FCA review into Anti-fraud controls and complaint handling in firms, as well as the future for reimbursing victims of online fraud and liability under the new Government. Delegates assessed approaches to strengthening business strategies for the detection and prevention of fraud, in light of concerns raised in the FCA’s review over the strength of the systems currently in place, and with the FCA currently conducting a Review of firms' treatment of customers in vulnerable circumstances, due to be published this year.

Sessions in the agenda included discussion on options for improving the effectiveness of the current system for reporting, investigating and prosecuting fraud, and the response of the criminal justice system, including sentencing.

These were discussed in the context of new and emerging types of fraud, looking at challenges in strategic coordination of data collection and intelligence-sharing between the public and private sectors, as well as with international partners, especially in light of the Government’s commitment to a Digital Information and Smart Data Bill, announced in the King’s Speech, which will aim to enhance data-sharing practices.

Further sessions considered the role of banking, technology and telecoms, payment companies, media and other key sectors in countering fraud and supporting customers.

There was discussion on key issues for consumers and banks, including what classes as ‘vulnerability’, along with data collection practices, following concerns raised by industry and in parliament over clauses in the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill which would have allowed government to ask banks for details of benefit claimants.

We are pleased to have been able to include further keynote sessions with: Nick Sharp, Deputy Director, Fraud, National Economic Crime Centre, NCA; Andrea Bowe, Director, Specialist Directorate Supervision, Policy and Competition - Markets, FCA; Oliver Hanmer, Head of Supervision, Compliance and Monitoring, Payment Systems Regulator; Riccardo Tordera Ricchi, Director, Policy and Government Relations, The Payments Association; Dr Jonathan Fisher KC, Barrister, Red Lion Chambers; and Senior Fellow, London School of Economics; and Stephanie Borthwick, Principal Policy Adviser, Which?.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• context: assessing the legal and regulatory landscape for tackling fraud in the UK and its current prevalence
• looking ahead: options for legislation and strategy, and priorities going forward
• regulation: priorities and developing frameworks to better support effective fraud prevention
• public awareness: fraud literacy and supporting vulnerable consumers and victims
• collaboration: strategies for coordinated prevention, reporting, investigation and prosecution
• policy: priorities for tackling fraud moving forward

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include officials from the Cabinet Office; DSIT; GLD; DBT; ICO; IPO; Department for the Economy, NI; DWP; OPSS; CMA; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; FSA; Defra; DfT; MHCLG; Department for Communities, NI; Department of Education, NI; Ofcom; and The Pensions Regulator.

This conference discussed next steps for youth justice in England and Wales.

With youth justice being highlighted as a focus in general election campaigning, the conference was a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss priorities for policy in the new parliament.

Delegates assessed the implementation and effectiveness of the NPCC Child Gravity Matrix Framework published last year, the tool used to assist in decisions for the most appropriate outcome for children, taking into account the offence committed and mitigating circumstances.

Further sessions included discussion on strategies for prevention and diversion away from the youth justice system, including improving attainment and access to education, supporting SEND provision, developing multi-agency coordination, and priorities for safeguarding and supporting vulnerable groups. It came with heightened concerns from some stakeholders on the availability of support facilities such as youth clubs or wider diversion schemes.

The conference followed the publication of the Youth Justice Board’s Strategic Plan 2024-2027 which sets out the Board’s vision for a Child First youth justice system. We expected discussion to bring out latest thinking on approaches for addressing challenges identified in the plan, including changes to society brought about by the pandemic, increased use and misuse of technology, a rise in inequalities, and cost of living pressures, as well as priorities for reducing inequalities, supporting victims of crime, and meeting children’s unmet needs. We also expected discussion on priorities for the YJB, with a planned review by the Cabinet Office of its role.

Further sessions examined the conditions and outcomes of youth custody. Areas for discussion included priorities for the opening of new secure schools, following the joint thematic inspection of work with children subject to remand in youth detention from the HM Inspectorate of Probation, which found that three quarters of young people awaiting sentence are remanded in custody, and the subsequent publication of the Government’s Action Plan.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Helen Davies, Head, Thematic and Joint Inspection, HM Inspectorate of Probation; Steve Chalke MBE, Founder, Oasis UK; and Professor Neal Hazel, Professor, Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Salford. We are re-confirming the availability of speakers in the pre-election period.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from CPS; YJB; DfE; MOJ; GLD; HMPPS; Judicial Office; Home Office; DWP; NAO; Ofsted; and the Welsh Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.  

This conference focused on next steps for tackling shoplifting and retail crime in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity to discuss key issues at a time of heightened focus on this area of policy in the run up to the General Election.

It followed the announcement by the Prime Minister of new measures to tackle retail crime, under which assaulting a shop worker will be made a standalone criminal offence, and perpetrators could be sent to prison for up to six months and receive unlimited fines. Delegates also discussed legislative proposals to make repeat offenders wear tags and increase the use of facial recognition technology.

Delegates examined policy options and the launch of the NPCC’s new Retail Crime Action Plan, committing to urgently attending scenes of violent shoplifting, alongside the Pegasus initiative, a business-police partnership, which aims to improve intelligence sharing to better identify offenders.

Looking at implementation plans for the strategy, discussion considered implications for a range of stakeholders, including proposals for increasing police presence at the scene, hotspot patrolling in high-crime areas, and development and implementation of problem-solving plans using the SARA model for high-risk areas.

Delegates assessed whether plans go far enough, looking at adequately protecting and training retail staff, and concern over possible displacement of retail crime.

Discussion considered priorities for effective cross-sector collaboration through data sharing and the formation of the new OPAL national team, as well as best practice for retailers in providing best possible evidence for police to pursue cases.

The conference was also an opportunity to explore the suitability of using AI technologies such as facial recognition to identify repeat offenders amidst concerns over biases in the use of such technologies.

In light of proposals to move away from short-term prison sentences, delegates also discussed how this may affect rates of retail crime in the future, the impact on retail workers, and priorities for effective deterrent strategies moving forward.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Katy Bourne OBE, Police and Crime Commissioner, Sussex; James Lowman, Chief Executive, Association of Convenience Stores; and Professor Emmeline Taylor, Professor of Criminology, School of Policy and Global Affairs, City, University of London.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• current retail crime landscape: addressing key issues for small retailers - priorities moving forward in light of offending figures rising
• Retail Crime Action Plan: assessing the scope - parameters of the Pegasus partnership - impact on stakeholders, including retailers, local authorities, police and society more broadly
• implementation: increased hotspot policing - training priorities - protecting staff - cross-sector collaboration models - data sharing - funding and resources
• sanctions: exploring current regulation - how the justice system can respond effectively to retail crime - priorities for reducing reoffending moving forward - addressing possible societal factors
• alternative approaches: assessing positions of opposition parties and their strategies for tackling shoplifting and retail crime
• innovation: the future of self-service check outs and priorities for managing retail crime with their increased use - implementing CCTV, facial recognition and new technology, including AI
• surveillance: addressing concerns around biases, disproportionality, and increased powers for government and police - considering the use of facial recognition to tackle repeat offenders
• policy: priorities for tackling retail crime and shoplifting moving forward

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DBT; DLUHC; the Home Office; ICO; MOJ; NAO; Probation Service; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed digitisation and the use of AI technology in the criminal justice system.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess how AI deployment across the system may impact the roles of the police, civil servants and legal professionals, employment and skills development, the day-to-day running of services, and criminal justice outcomes.

We expected discussion to reflect key issues emerging from:

• plans for service improvement outlined in the Ministry of Justice’s Digital Strategy
• the House of Lords’ AI technology and the justice system report, which cited both potential benefits to legal productivity and decision-making as well as risks to civil liberties, and called for the establishment of minimum standards and training
• the principles of safety, fairness, transparency and accountability put forward in the Government’s A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation white paper

Discussion considered the role of AI technologies in supporting policing and court services, including opportunities to increase both access to justice and efficiency of decision-making throughout the justice system, and strategies for effective and fair utilisation.

Delegates assessed how key challenges could be addressed, including determining where the human-machine interfaces lie in different contexts, concerns over algorithmic biases and differences in human judgement, and protecting human rights and civil liberties.

Further sessions examined the use of AI more widely in government and public services in areas related to the criminal justice system, including how effectively government is maximising opportunities and mitigating risks - which is the subject of an NAO study.

Delegates also looked at international comparisons of AI integration, as the EU moves to create the first comprehensive regulatory framework for AI as part of its digital strategy.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Mike Freer MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Courts and Legal Services, Ministry of Justice; Megan Lee Devlin, Director General for Service Delivery Transformation, Ministry of Justice; Ruth Kelly, Chief Analyst, National Audit Office; Phil Bowen, Director, Centre for Justice Innovation; and Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CMA; CPS; HMCTS; HMPPS; MOJ; NCA; DWP; HSE; DBT; DLUHC; DfT; DSIT; Dstl; DVSA; Education Scotland; GLD; HMRC; Home Office; ICO; NAO; Ofcom; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference looked at next steps for leasehold reform in England and Wales, with the Leasehold and Freehold Bill progressing through Parliament.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to discuss key measures in the Bill, including the extension of standard leases from 90 to 990 years.

Delegates looked at options for addressing stakeholder concerns around the affordability of leaseholds, maintenance of property and uncertainty around implementation, especially in the lead up to a general election, with further discussion on the ripple effects on the broader residential market.

They also looked ahead to priorities for the Government’s next stage of reform aiming to abolish new leaseholds for new houses, as well as addressing current exceptions to the ban, including the decision not to ban new leaseholds for flats, exemptions for retirement housing, and land that has already been leased.

Further sessions examined issues going forward, including redress in property disputes, the implementation of ground rent reforms, and the impact on markets, landlords and developers.

Discussion considered alternatives to leasehold, including the future place of commonhold, with a focus on the suitability of the model for the English and Welsh markets, how the model could be made more attractive for lenders, developers and investors, and making the process more efficient and less costly.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Judge Siobhan McGrath, President, First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), Courts and Tribunals Judiciary; Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Commissioner, Law Commission of England and Wales; and Professor Martin Dixon, Professor of the Law of Real Property, University of Cambridge.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DLUHC; DWP; Law Commission; GLD; DBT; HM Land Registry; Homes England; Defra; HMRC; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined priorities for optimising mediation and arbitration in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess the impact of the Government’s plans to integrate mandatory mediation into all small claims in the civil justice system, as well as measures outlined in the Arbitration Bill, announced in the Kings Speech.

Delegates considered the current state of the market and next steps for integrated mediation, looking at implications of increased use, innovative approaches and collaborative solutions to navigating disputes, and building understanding.

There was also a focus on priorities for workforce development and building capacity across all types of dispute, looking at options for greater oversight on standards, quality and training in the sector, as well as the way forward for encouraging greater diversity in arbitrator selection.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Lord Neuberger, Arbitrator, One Essex Court; and former President, Supreme Court (2012-2017); Kim Wager, Head of Dispute Resolution Policy, Ministry of Justice; Rebecca Clark, Chair, Civil Mediation Council; and Jonathan Wood, President, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; and Chair, International Arbitration, Reynolds Porter Chamberlain.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• Government’s strategy: impact of increased integration of mandatory mediation into all small claims in the civil justice system - improving service delivery as the number of mediation users grow - greater emphasis on avoidance strategies
• Arbitration Bill: assessing the future of domestic and international arbitration under the new Bill - exploring the effectiveness of measures in Bill - the way forward for modernisation 
• workforce: impact of increased use of mediation on the legal profession - priorities for training and professional development - establishing clear standards - addressing concerns regarding lack of diversity
• system efficiency: assessing capacity to deal with increasing reliance on mediation - enabling and promoting effective management of the civil justice system as a whole - identifying areas for improvement
• role of the courts: imposing sanctions and enforcing effective mandatory mediation - considering recent cases which clarify the ability of courts to compel parties to engage in mediation
• service users: building public understanding and confidence in mediation - improving communication, access, support and safeguarding for users - integration priorities for those using mediation, particularly litigants in person - cost management
• technology: the role of tech in enhancing the effectiveness and accessibility of mediation and arbitration processes - upskilling the workforce to deal with increased integration of technology

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CJC; GLD; HMCTS; Law Commission; Home Office; MOJ; NAO; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined next steps for the probation system in England and Wales.

Following reunification in 2021, delegates assessed current progress and priorities for future improvements in the probation system.

It took place following the commitment to the Victims and Prisoners Bill in the King’s Speech, for reform to the parole system regarding the release of dangerous offenders. Measures also announced include the presumption that sentences under 12 months will be served in the community and an extension to the early release scheme for lower-risk prisoners, in an aim to alleviate overcrowding in prison.

Delegates assessed issues for implementation of these measures, looking at implications for the probation service and its partners, and what will be needed to ensure that the system has capacity to service new demands.

We expected discussion on frameworks for providing rehabilitation for offenders and reducing reoffending in light of the new measures, including community engagement, local partnerships, commissioned rehabilitation services, offender management, and offender resettlement.

The agenda also looked at priorities for managing the impact on probation staff, including workload, as well as on past and potential victims.

Further discussion examined priorities for supporting both the current workforce and new staff entering the service, looking at training and recruitment practices, professional development, workforce culture, workloads and resources and implications for the HMPPS’ Probation Workforce Strategy (2023-2025). Delegates also considered longer-term priorities for government and policy to effectively support probation services and their workforce.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Kim Thornden-Edwards, Chief Probation Officer, HM Prison and Probation Service, Ministry of Justice; Phil Bowen, Director, Centre for Justice Innovation; Jenny George, Director, Justice Value-For-Money Studies, National Audit Office; and Ian Lawrence, General Secretary, Trade Union and Professional Association for Probation and Family Court Staff, Napo.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• Offender management: considering reform - exploring concerns - risk management errors - staff workload - improving information sharing - next steps for public protection moving forward
• Supporting rehabilitation: exploring collaborative approaches to reducing reoffending - community reintegration - risk management
• Workforce: staffing and recruitment - impact of changes to sentencing and to the Victims and Prisoners Bill - priorities for supporting the probation workforce
• Third sector role: priorities for increasing partnerships with the voluntary sector and improving joint-working within the probation system
• Prison overcrowding: assessing the impact of the increasing prison population on the probation system - exploring early releases, changes to IPP sentences and community sentences
• Reunification: assessing current progress and next steps for improvement - policy priorities for the probation service
• Increased localisation: considering the proposed seven area model - exploring devolved offender management - local commissioning and solutions

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DCMS; DHSC; DWP; GLD; HMPPS; Home Office; MOJ; PBNI; PPO; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined next steps for legal professional ethics and integrity in the UK.

It brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine latest developments and challenges, including the way forward for regulation and policy, the roles and responsibilities of regulatory bodies and the legal profession itself, and how legal education may need to respond in helping embed ethical training in preparing lawyers to enter the profession.

The discussion took place amidst heightened focus on the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry, alongside further regulatory focus on these issues following the SRA’s review into the usage of NDAs by law firms, and the Legal Service Board’s Reshaping legal services: a sector-wide strategy.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Matthew Hill, Chief Executive, Legal Services Board; Sara Carnegie, Director of Legal Projects, International Bar Association; Professor Richard Moorhead, Professor of Law and Professional Ethics, University of Exeter; Professor Andrew Boon, School of Law, City, University of London; and Juliet Oliver, Deputy Chief Executive, General Counsel and Executive Director, Investigations and Enforcement, Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• current approaches to ethical practice: effectiveness of ethical codes, and options for development - instilling trust and appropriate transparency - assessing the new regulatory position of SLAPPs
• priorities for legal practices in maintaining ethical standards:
  
  • lessons to be learned from the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry
  • assessing the parameters of the modern lawyer’s role and identifying ethical considerations for legal practitioners in providing services to clients
  • discussing how challenges for ethical practice can be addressed, including support for staff, culture and training in firms, and governance and monitoring structures
  • best practice and case studies in managing professional tensions between serving what could be seen as greater public good and the use of tools such as NDAs
• key issues for regulation:
  
  • improving awareness of SRA principles regarding the use of NDAs
  • examining the positions of the Bar Council and LSB on the future direction and scope of regulation
  • how can communication, training, monitoring and compliance be improved
• education, training and best practice:
  
  • integrating legal ethics into education
  • the effect of new legal training structures on legal practice
  • approaches to self-regulatory strategies and culture change - the role of those in leadership positions in legal practices
  • lessons from approaches in other sectors and jurisdictions to ethical education, governance and compliance

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the DWP; GLD; HMCTS; Home Office; Judicial Office; MOJ; and Ofcom.

This conference focused on next steps for UK’s post-Brexit immigration policy - and it took place with heightened political and public debate on options going forward following the ONS’s recently published updated migration figures.

It brought key stakeholders together with policymakers to discuss the impact of the points-based immigration system, as well as how the immigration system can best be utilised to support the UK labour market.

The conference followed the Migration Advisory Committee’s inquiries into the shortage occupation list and seasonal worker visas, and findings in the ONS’s revised long-term international migration report in November 2023 indicating net migration figures rising to 672kú

Delegates considered policy options for the future as government aims to reduce net migration numbers, as well as key issues moving forward and options for alternative strategies.

Further sessions explored the future of international student migration, including employment in the UK job market post-graduation, with discussion also expected on ways in which labour exploitation within the UK can be tackled.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Philippa Rouse, Director for Migration & Citizenship and Senior Responsible Officer for the Future Border and Immigration System Programme, Home Office; Dr Madeleine Sumption, Director, Migration Observatory; and Kate Nicholls, Chief Executive Officer, UKHospitality.

Further sessions examined wider sector issues, including:

• trends: the current outlook for the UK immigration system - net migration statistics - progress of the points-based system - impact on user experience - priorities for strategy moving forward
• policy: assessing government commitments - policy coordination to enable an effective system - alignment with current economic pledges and objectives
• priorities moving forward: responding to the most recent net migration figures and labour shortages - the potential for reform and alternative policy approaches

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DAERA, NI; DCEDIY, ROI; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Health, NI; DfE; DfT; DLUHC; DSIT; DWP; FCDO; HMRC; Home Office; MAC; MOJ; NAO; OBR; UKRI; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government - as well as parliamentary pass-holders from both Houses of Parliament.

This conference assessed the future for the use of AI in legal practice and implications for law firms, those working in them, and service users.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to examine regulatory challenges, and the direction of policy following the Government’s white paper on A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation.

Discussion looked at how AI technologies can be utilised to increase both access and efficiency for legal services.

Delegates discussed strategies and challenges for effective implementation of AI to enhance process and services, including where the human-machine interfaces lie in different contexts, and priorities for mitigating potential risks that AI poses.

It was also an opportunity to discuss how AI deployment in the sector may impact the roles of legal professionals and the day-to-day running of services for different legal positions.

Further sessions examined the impact of AI transitions within the legal sector on training and education for both existing and aspiring lawyers, and how to effectively navigate and support lawyers through a transition to increased integration of AI within legal practice.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Matthew Hill, Chief Executive, Legal Services Board; Professor Richard Susskind, President, Society for Computers and Law; Ian Jeffrey, Chief Executive Officer, Law Society; and Shobana Iyer, Vice-Chair, Legal Services Committee, Bar Council.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• regulatory implications: assessing the impact of AI technology on regulation in the legal profession, including AI technology as an entity and issues of accountability
• consumer impact: what legal services may look like for consumers when supported by AI - access to services - mitigating risks of data and biases - what this means for accountability and liability
• ensuring the quality of AI integration: exploring frameworks and strategies needed to effectively integrate technology into legal services - how the quality of AI can be measured and maintained
• the legal workforce and an AI transition:
  
  • implications across all roles in firms, as well as legal education, upskilling and CPD
  • best practice in supporting adaptation - impact on aspiring and newly qualified lawyers
• R&D: priorities for future investment to sustain the development of AI in the legal sector
• future direction: exploring the priorities for the legal profession moving forward as AI technologies continue to advance

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DBT; DCMS; Defra; DfE; DfT; DLUHC; DSIT; DWP; GLD; HMCTS; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; HSE; IfATE; MOJ; NAO; NCA; Ofcom; ORR; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on next steps for tackling anti-social behaviour in England and Wales.

It brought together key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss implementation and the potential impact of the Government’s Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan, published earlier this year.

With aims to increase powers and funding to local authorities, PCCs and police forces to tackle the issue, delegates discussed enforcement in communities, and priorities for policing and for supporting victims, as well as redress for those affected by anti-social behaviour.

It was an opportunity to assess the initial progress of hotspot policing and immediate justice pilots in Durham, with figures published in October 2023 indicating a reduction in anti-social behaviour rates as a result.

Following The Scottish Government’s announcement of a new, independently chaired working group aiming to address anti-social behaviour, delegates explored findings and recommendations of the report conducted in collaboration with the Scottish Community Safety Network, priorities for tackling key issues, and what can be learnt from other jurisdictions.

Further sessions examined delivery of the Action Plan, including consideration of resources and funding, collaboration between key sectors, enforcement, and priorities for best practice. Delegates also looked at tackling anti-social behaviour on public transport, with the Government launching pilot schemes to introduce new transport safety officers.

There was also discussion on concerns that some proposed measures could have unintended negative consequences for some groups in society, latest thinking on addressing underlying socio-economic factors and alternative approaches to policy on anti-social behaviour.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Joy Allen, Police and Crime Commissioner, Durham; and Benjamin Archer, Lecturer in Law, Department of Law and Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University; John Hayward-Cripps, Chief Executive Officer, Neighbourhood Watch Network; and Lorraine Gillies, Chief Officer, Scottish Community Safety Network.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• Anti-Social Behaviour Action Plan: assessing potential impact - recent trends - increased powers - resourcing and use of funding - developing a collaborative approach
• victims: considering the impact of anti-social behaviour on those affected - priorities for safeguarding - approaches to redress and achieving justice 
• enforcement: assessing progress and next steps for anti-social behaviour policing - hotspot policing and immediate justice schemes - dispersal orders - enforcement strategy 
• community engagement: fostering collaborative approaches - roles of local stakeholders in prevention and early intervention - public messaging and encouraging orderly behaviour - best practice
• targeting enforcement: considering unintended consequences of dispersal orders and other powers - protecting vulnerable groups from homelessness and criminalisation
• policy options: exploring alternative strategies for reducing anti-social behaviour - addressing underlying socio-economic factors - frameworks for adapting policy to deal with future challenges

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; DLUHC; Home Office; MOJ; and The Scottish Government.

This conference brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine next steps for tackling fraud and financial crime in the UK.

With the Government’s aim to reduce fraud and cybercrime by 10% by 2025, it was a timely opportunity to assess the new Fraud Strategy published by the Home Office in May 2023.

It followed concern that recent legislation, including the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, did not go far enough to address the threat posed by fraud to sectors and individuals.

Delegates examined key measures announced in the new strategy, including:

• establishment of the new National Fraud Squad
• prioritising fraud within police forces
• improving reporting systems and promoting information sharing between industry and authorities
• expanding the role of Economic Crime Victim Care Units

Attendees discussed how the proposals can be translated into effective intervention and the resources that will be needed for implementation.

Further sessions looked at the role of key sectors in countering fraud, including:

• cooperation between the public and private sectors, and UK and foreign governments, with strategic coordination of data and intelligence-sharing
• reporting and support services for victims, and improving the police and prosecution services’ response to fraud

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Emma Merry, Head of Protect, Fraud Policy Unit, Home Office; Andrew Penhale, Chief Crown Prosecutor, Head of Regional and Wales SEOCID, Crown Prosecution Service; and Joshua Reddaway, Director, Counter Fraud and Corruption, National Audit Office.

Overall, sessions in the agenda included discussion on:

• addressing the prevalence of fraud: key issues and priorities for reducing incidence - policy priorities moving forward - defining key targets and measuring performance
• enforcement measures: preparing for and managing increased enforcement with establishment of the Public Sector Fraud Authority - collaborative structures, resources, recruitment and training
• investigation and prosecution: addressing the length of fraud and financial crime cases - resources and cost - effectiveness of criminal sanctions - rates of recidivism - staff recruitment and skills
• prevention: enabling effective disruption mechanisms - fully utilising data-sharing - strategic coordination, including public-private partnerships and global cooperation
• support for the public: improving victim support and economic crime care units - delivering counter-fraud education and improving public awareness - reforming reporting procedures

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CPS; DBT; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Finance, NI; DESNZ; DHSC; DWP; GIAA; GLD; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; NAO; and the Welsh Government.

This conference looked at next steps for leasehold reform in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity to discuss the impact of the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022, and priorities for the Government’s next stage of reform following speculation that plans to abolish the leasehold system have been dropped. 

Following the passing of the Act, the conference brought together stakeholders and policymakers to examine issues moving forward, including dispute resolution, the implementation of ground rent reform, and impact on the market, landlords and developers.

Discussion looked at the next stage of the Government’s legislative programme, with a new Leasehold Bill expected in the forthcoming King’s Speech, including a potential cap on ground rents, the abolition of marriage value, and increased powers for leaseholders.

Delegates examined alternatives to leasehold, with a focus on the future place of the commonhold model, including suitability for the English and Welsh markets, how the model could be made more attractive for lenders, developers, and investors, and making the process more efficient and less costly.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Rebecca Marsh, Property Ombudsman; Judge Siobhan McGrath, President, First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), Courts and Tribunals Judiciary; Professor Susan Bright, Professor of Land Law, University of Oxford; and Mervyn Skeet, Director of General Insurance Policy, Association of British Insurers.

Further sessions examined wider sector issues, including:

• resolving property disputes: assessing the use of alternative dispute resolution to settle disagreements in the residential landlord sector - key priorities for the sector moving forward
• building safety and pledges for net zero: key issues relating to building safety concerns - the impact of net zero targets on leaseholders - implications for future property law reforms

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DBT; Defra; DLUHC; HMLR; HMRC; UKSA; and the Welsh Government - as well as parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons.

This conference looked at latest developments and next steps for equality, diversity and inclusion in the legal profession.

It was a timely opportunity to consider the progress of diversity in the legal profession and priorities for future improvement, and followed the Government announcement of plans to allow CILEX lawyers with seven years’ experience to apply to become Recorders and Judges of the Upper Tribunal.

The agenda included discussion on how the legal sector can support the career progression of minority groups to increase the visible diversity in senior legal roles, looking at examples from other sectors and assessing the success of mentoring and sponsorship techniques.

We also expected discussion on invisible diversity and issues across all levels in the profession.

Delegates examined the role of regulatory requirements as well as their effectiveness, initiatives and best practice in developing a diverse system, the social mobility of minority lawyers in the profession, and the impact of workplace culture on progression to senior roles.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Richard Orpin, Director, Regulation and Policy, Legal Services Board; Paul Philip, Chief Executive, Solicitors Regulation Authority; and Rupika Madhura, Director of Standards, Bar Standards Board.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• regulation: role in promoting EDI in the legal sector - regulatory requirements and priorities - initiatives and next steps - sector responsibilities - future areas of focus
• developing a diverse system: practical approaches - assessing progress - best practice in tackling barriers - reporting and use of data - setting frameworks and targets - priorities moving forward
• social mobility: widening access to legal education - attracting new lawyers - recruitment and retention - from mentoring to sponsorships - fostering progression to senior roles
• workplace culture: developing inclusivity to support career progression - opportunities for flexible working - supporting mental health and wellbeing
• the judiciary: priorities, next steps and prospects for improving diversity in judicial and senior legal roles

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CMA; DBT; GLD; HMCTS; HMPPS; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; IfATE; ICIBI; MOJ; NAO; OAG; OEP; Ofcom; Probation Service; Scottish Law Commission; The Insolvency Service; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine the next steps for tackling modern slavery in the UK.

Following the introduction to Parliament of the Illegal Migration Bill, it was a timely opportunity to consider the impact, implementation and appropriateness of new measures aimed at preventing illegal arrivals from both accessing modern slavery support and using referrals to block their detention and removal.

Delegates examined implications for the UK’s modern slavery strategy and for relevant legislation moving forward, as well as for enforcement, international partnerships and support for victims.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Julia Mulligan, Chair, Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority; Caroline Haughey KC, Barrister, Furnival Chambers; and Andrea Salvoni, Deputy Coordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.

Sessions in the agenda explored:

• enforcement and identification:
  
  • funding priorities - improving coordination of responsible agencies in the current system to enable more effective working across the range of issues affecting modern slavery
  • options for the creation of a single enforcement body and simplification of the current enforcement landscape and responsibilities
• support for victims:
  
  • the response of enforcement agencies and criminal justice to modern slavery - how to improve current mechanisms for detection and investigation
  • opportunities for reforming the National Referral Mechanism to help tackle current backlogs, improve decision-making timeframes and connect victims to the services they need
• supply chains:
  
  • the role of businesses in combatting modern slavery at home and abroad
  • enhancing due diligence checks and the introduction of ethical and modern-slavery-conscious procurement and supply chains

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from Border Force; CQC; Defra; DLUHC; DHSC; Department for the Economy, NI; DWP; FCDO; HMPPS; HMRC; Home Office; NCA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference looked at next steps for legal education and training in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity to consider progress in the implementation and experiences so far for students taking the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), which was introduced as the new standardised assessment for qualifying as a solicitor from September 2021.

Sessions also assessed next steps for improving and widening access to the legal profession, and the rollout of T levels in Legal Services which is due to begin in September 2023, as well as the wider issues of accessibility, diversity, and inclusion in the legal sector, and how the introduction of new pathways will impact both students and the legal profession.

We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Matthew Hill, Chief Executive, Legal Services Board; Julie Swan, Director of Education and Training, Solicitors Regulation Authority; and Mark Neale, Director General, Bar Standards Board.

Further sessions examined wider sector issues, including:

• the role of legal regulators: priorities for facilitating ongoing competence of legal professionals in light of changes to the pathways for qualifying as a solicitor or barrister in England and Wales
• improving access to the profession: assessing the role of traditional university routes, the rise of legal apprenticeships, and improving diversity and inclusion
• legal technology and AI: discussing the progress and potential impact of technology on the future of legal services and education and training

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the DfE; DSIT; DfT; GLD; HMCTS; HM Treasury; Home Office; MOJ; and the Welsh Government.