Westminster Higher Education Forum

This conference considered next steps for the Lifelong Learning Entitlement and priorities for its launch in England in 2026.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to assess the way forward for lifelong learning entitlement’s phased rollout from January 2027, with students able to apply for funding from September 2026, looking at challenges facing universities, further education providers, and employers in adapting to the new funding system. It took place in the context of the Spending Review 2025 and the Modern Industrial Strategy which committed to the Lifelong Learning Entitlement and an additional £1.2bn annual investment in skills by 2028-29, with the aim to drive economic growth and boost opportunity, including in lifelong learning.

Preparing for rollout & addressing challenges
Sessions in the agenda considered the readiness of providers for implementation and administrative and operational challenges in delivering the new integrated system. Areas for discussion included preparations for modular learning and standalone module funding, the design of student finance for lifelong learners, and the impact of implementation delays on stakeholder confidence, infrastructure planning and student engagement.

Modular learning & flexible learning
Those attending also examined the shift to funding and delivering individual modules at Levels 4-6, allowing learners to access elements of qualifications rather than full courses to support greater study flexibility. How the Lifelong Learning Entitlement can deliver a flexible, learner-driven model was discussed, looking at supporting stackable qualifications, and approaches to facilitating credit accumulation and transfer between institutions.

Delegates considered the development of a credit accumulation and transfer framework to ensure learner progress is recognised and portable. Priorities for course design and delivery were discussed, and how to ensure modules are functional as standalone units with clear outcomes and alignment to employer needs.

Finance model
There was also discussion on the wider efficacy of the financial model in meeting evolving needs of lifelong learners, as well as regulatory and funding implications, including interaction with the Office for Students, quality assurance, and existing qualification frameworks. Discussion centred on priorities for balancing flexibility and financial sustainability with learners engaging in standalone modules rather than traditional degree-level qualifications, including cost-sharing between higher and further education institutions in developing and delivering modular content and pooling resources.

Meeting skills needs
Further sessions assessed the role of employers and industry partnerships, and how the entitlement aligns with regional skills shortages, workforce demands, and broader economic aims following commitments in the Spending Review, with additional investment in the skills system each year over the course of the Spending Review with the aim of increasing opportunity, including in lifelong learning. Delegates examined how the system can best support mid-career retraining, including potential incentives to drive employer engagement, as well as looking at the adaptability of the framework for sectors facing rapidly changing skill requirements. The way forward for employer partnerships was considered, alongside priorities for regional upskilling.

Delegates assessed the balance between flexibility and financial sustainability, examining whether the integration of the lifelong learning entitlement into the existing student finance system will create complexity for both learners and providers, and approaches for mitigating this impact moving forward.

Encouraging take-up
We also expected a focus on widening and engaging participation in lifelong learning, with discussion on approaches to tackling barriers to participation, supporting social mobility and economic inclusion. Delegates examined learner willingness to take on loan-based funding later in life, and how this might impact uptake, particularly with reports that over 60s will not be able to access university loans from 2027.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from the Department for Education; Department for Business and Trade; Department for Energy Security and Net Zero; Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Office for Life Sciences; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Department for Work and Pensions; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Education, ROI; Institute of Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Ministry of Justice; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference looked at priorities for universities and their role in contributing to local economies and growth in the UK.

Policy affecting HEIs
It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to discuss next steps in the context of a range of policy developments, including the Government recently committing to publish a Post-16 Education and Skills White Paper.

Delegates assessed implications of The UK’s Modern Industrial Strategy, with it highlighting the importance of universities to the local economy, and committing continued support for HEIs through the Higher Education Innovation Fund.

With concerns surrounding the financial sustainability of HEIs - and with universities looking to balance their civic, educational and research missions with commercial and regional development - sessions considered potential opportunities offered by the 2025 Spending Review and the Government’s wider growth strategy, including funding for innovation clusters, infrastructure, and place-based research and development.

The £22.5bn per year research and development investment plan for university research, commercialisation, and public-private partnerships was also discussed, with delegates considering strategies to enhance funding models that blend public and private investment to maximise place-based innovation.

Local collaboration & the Industrial Strategy
Delegates looked at how the Government’s devolution agenda might impact HEI collaboration with strategic authorities and businesses. Areas for discussion included the development of investment zones, clusters and related infrastructure, innovation hubs, as well as wider regional university-business partnerships aimed at driving innovation and supporting local economic growth - with recent initiatives, such as the founding of the Technology and Growth Alliance involving the UK defence sector and Cranfield University, expected to be explored.

Sessions considered strategies and frameworks for engagement between universities and local and combined authorities, and devolved administrations, to support regional economic blueprints and skills pipelines, including approaches to collecting data on economic benefits. Discussion also considered challenges in aligning university strategies with local authority expectations, varying regional economic conditions, and labour market capacity.

Further discussion looked at implications of the Industrial Strategy for partnerships between HEIs and local authorities - and for regional relationships between businesses and universities - in the context of policy objectives around growth, productivity, and skills development. Delegates considered how collaborative frameworks can evolve to both drive innovation and deliver tangible local economic benefits.

Examining the role of universities in developing regionally-led innovation clusters and translating research and development into economic impact, delegates assessed implications of the new Local Innovation Partnerships Fund and strategies to increase high-skilled job creation and productivity gains. Sessions looked at the place-based pillar of the Industrial Strategy and its alignment with local industrial specialisms and sector plans.

Discussion considered the potential for universities to act as conveners of innovation ecosystems across public and private sectors, in line with evolving government priorities in the Industrial Strategy and the Artificial Intelligence Opportunities Action Plan. Delegates examined how universities can support regional artificial intelligence capacity through computing infrastructure, data partnerships, and skills development aligned with local industry needs. There was also a focus on the contribution of universities to sector-specific Industrial Strategy goals in areas such as clean energy, life sciences, and advanced manufacturing.

Procurement & new legislation
Attendees assessed the role of university procurement practices in supporting local economies in the context of recent implementation of the Procurement Act 2023. We expected discussion on how universities are approaching embedding inclusive procurement practices in line with the Act - prioritising local SMEs, social enterprises, and environmentally responsible suppliers - along with any issues and the impact on wider public value.

With new legislation expected to further strengthen university-community partnerships, we expected the morning to bring out best practice examples in university partnerships with local stakeholders on civic projects. Delegates also considered issues relating to wider policy, including reform to the Office for Students in its forthcoming 2025-2030 strategy, updated planning frameworks for delivering infrastructure projects, and impact of immigration policy on student retention.

HEI funding, financial sustainability & the role of students
There was also a focus on options for policy and sector practice to help institutions to manage financial strains. Attendees examined the Shared Prosperity Fund, Higher Education Innovation Fund and the UKRI Innovation Accelerator, as well as potential new funding routes stemming from devolved powers, and regional availability of private finance. Sessions also examined blended funding models that combine public and private investment to support regional innovation priorities, and best practice in start-up and spin-out development.

Further sessions looked at the local economic impact of students and graduates, with latest thinking on the role of international students, as well as local economic implications of recent fee and visa reforms.

Areas for discussion included strategies linking graduate retention with boosting local economies, including frameworks for strengthening collaboration between universities and businesses on achieving positive graduate outcomes. Delegates explored place-based graduate retention strategies, such as internship and enterprise programmes, and how local labour market intelligence can help shape curriculum and careers support.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons and officials from the Department of Health and Social Care; Department for Business and Trade; Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government; Department for the Economy, NI; Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; National Audit Office; National Infrastructure Commission; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focused on the future for international students in the UK.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to assess the direction of government policy and priorities going forward for the higher education sector and students themselves, including around international student recruitment and its impact on UK universities, visa policy, net migration levels, and proposed changes to the Graduate Route - including potentially reducing its duration from two years to eighteen months.

The conference came with indications that the UK is regaining ground as an international study destination, as highlighted in recent global demand rankings and reports of a more diversified international recruitment landscape.

Proposed immigration changes
Following the publication of the Government’s Immigration White Paper - including proposals to introduce a tax for every international student enrolled at a UK university - discussion examined the economic impact of the proposed levy. Its effect on student decision-making and affordability was considered, as well as on institutional finances and the UK’s global competitiveness, following recent concerns raised by the Mayor of London and sector leaders about the impact such a levy could have on the attractiveness of the UK as a study destination.

Sessions explored the potential effect of these changes on international enrolment trends, how they align with the Government’s wider objectives on net migration reduction, labour market supply, and economic growth, as well as potential changes to policy that can take account of the impact on the higher education sector.

Delegates also assessed proposals for strengthening requirements regarding sponsoring institutions and recruitment of international students, including new interventions should a sponsor not meet their required duties, as well as reducing the length of time graduates can remain in the UK to 18 months following their studies - with the Home Office also launching a new campaign to tackle the number of international students claiming asylum post-studies.

We expected discussion on the potential impact of proposals on universities, how the sector and individual institutions can respond, and what support they may need moving forward, as well as further factors such as regional differences in the ability of institutions to adapt to proposed reforms.

Implications of wider developments such as the new UK-EU trade deal and potential progress towards reinstating the Erasmus programme was also considered, alongside the impact on the further education sector and international students who transition from further education to higher education.

Sessions also considered recent administrative changes to visa processing, including the move to digital eVisas, and their implications for accessibility, security, and student experience.

International student recruitment
Looking at priorities for supporting sustainability in the UK’s higher education sector, sessions examined latest thinking on strategic best practice for international student recruitment, particularly in light of restrictions on student dependents, as well as the potential impact of White Paper proposals on enrolment patterns. Alternative options for universities, looking beyond the current role of international students in supporting financial resilience, were a key focus, with discussion on how this is being developed by higher education institutions and how it can develop in the future. Discussion was also expected on potential reform to the student levy and the financial strain this could place on English universities, as well as whether it would lower international student recruitment.

Delegates discussed what will be needed from policy, regulation, and the sector itself to address barriers to international student recruitment, such as visa route complexity, post-study work opportunities, and cost of living concerns.

Those attending looked at strategies for improving the wider competitiveness of the UK’s educational offer in terms of course quality and teaching. Sessions also examined how the UK compares with competitor destinations such as Australia, Canada and the US in terms of post-study work options, cost, and student support, with government proposing to reduce the amount of time international graduates can stay in the UK post-study. Delegates also considered concerns surrounding admissions standards and assessment quality, and how the UK can maintain its global reputation for high standards in higher education.

Student experience
Further sessions discussed priorities for improving international student experience, with a focus on sustaining high-quality standards in teaching and research within an increasingly crowded and demanding global market.

Delegates looked at how to ensure wider factors are in place in UK higher education institutions to serve key student needs, such as attractive and modernised facilities, housing and accommodation, tailored academic resources, integration support, and campus cultures that support diversity and provide a welcoming environment.

Overall areas for discussion

• international student recruitment:
  
  • implications of proposals in the Immigration White Paper on recruitment, including imposed limits on recruitment and strengthened sponsor institution requirements
  • discussing key challenges and emerging opportunities - assessing Erasmus+ participation and options for UK-EU youth mobility schemes moving forward
• institution priorities and competitiveness:
  
  • assessing and meeting expectations across the sector - developing institutional compliance with enhanced visa requirements - addressing the design of action plans
  • accounting for capacity constraints - maintaining global institutional reputation and competitiveness - the UK-EU trade deal and potential movement towards an Erasmus programme
• finance:
  
  • the contribution of international students to UK higher education institution finances and alternative options - priorities for sector-specific funding frameworks moving forward
  • assessing multi-year funding models - mitigating sudden financial shortfalls - supporting strategic long-term planning  
  • considering a potential levy on higher education provider income from international students
• application processes and access:
  
  • options for streamlining and reducing complexity - improving transparency of timelines - mitigating administrative burdens - clarity on eligibility frameworks
  • refining application deadlines - timely release of funds - enhancing targeted support measures - financial support for disadvantaged students - promoting equitable student participation
• international student experience:
  
  • assessing international student expectations - how the UK can meet current expectations - fostering welcoming and inclusive campus cultures - tackling harassment and isolation
  • priorities for teaching, learning and support - sharing and learning from international competitors and best practice
• employment and further study for international students:
  
  • implications of reducing the time international students can spend in the UK post-study - support and guidance post-graduation - reviewing post-study work thresholds
  • impact of proposed changes to English language requirements and skilled visa thresholds - next steps for the skilled worker route - supporting students on graduate skill level employment
  • strategies to support future global engagement and research partnerships - priorities for improving provider and employer engagement in placement design and delivery

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from the Department for Education; Department for Business and Trade; Department for Work and Pensions; Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; Migration Advisory Committee; Home Office; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed next steps for freedom of speech in UK higher education. It took place with the Government announcing a renewed commitment to implement key provisions in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, whilst removing some provisions, and follows recent publication of new guidance from the OfS designed to help institutions navigate their duties under the Act ahead of their introduction from August 2025 and respond to different scenarios.

Implications and priorities
It brought key stakeholders, regulators and policymakers together to discuss priorities as universities prepare for the implementation of the reformed Act, and enforcement of new duties and responsibilities before the 2025/2026 academic year. These included the strengthened duty on HEIs to secure and promote freedom of speech and academic freedom, in line with new OfS guidance, alongside amendments to OfS complaints scheme.

We also expected delegates to assess implications of the removal of measures from the legislation, such as those which would have allowed individuals to sue universities for failing to uphold free speech duties alongside increased students’ union duties in this area.

The conference was also an opportunity to look ahead to the potential introduction of further legislation in a future King’s Speech.

Responsibilities and new regulatory powers
Attendees considered the evolving role of the OfS, with the Act granting it new powers to investigate breaches of free speech duties and issue fines, and how institutions can comply with new guidance and duties on decision-making frameworks institutions should use when managing speech-related cases. Areas for discussion included requirements for transparency, governance oversight, and the recording of free speech decisions across appointments, events and internal complaints.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on practical considerations for institutions in meeting responsibilities related to free expression, while balancing concerns around campus culture, student safety, academic integrity, liability, and financial and administrative burdens. Sessions explored strategies to assist universities in updating codes of practice to meet legal requirements, embedding these within staff training, external speaker policies, and governance processes, as well as approaches to navigating reputational risks, protest and disruption, and challenges from external and internal interest groups.

Complaints, compliance, and balancing with safeguarding
Areas for discussion included safeguarding against harm and harassment, alongside roles and responsibilities of the HE sector and individual institutions, their staff and students following the OfS’s recent detailed guidance on legal duties, which outlines how universities and students’ unions should assess whether speech is lawful, what ‘reasonably practicable steps’ look like in practice, and how to align complaints procedures with the new regulatory framework. Discussion considered how institutions can uphold freedom of speech while meeting equality and safeguarding duties, including best practice in handling contentious topics and managing visiting speakers, and priorities for the protection of institutional reputation and policies in light of the banning of non-disclosure agreements.

Attendees examined how institutions can effectively develop internal processes for handling complaints, and next steps for regulation in response to lessons learnt from early cases under the new framework, as well as preparing for dual complaints processes, with the OIA fielding complaints from students and the OfS for staff and visiting speakers.

Campus culture and students’ unions
Sessions assessed implications of key provisions of the Act, including the new statutory duties on universities, colleges, and students’ unions, looking at operational challenges of implementing free speech policies. The role of students’ unions moving forward and priorities in the wider approach to campus culture were also discussed, looking at strategies for promoting a culture of free expression on campus whilst maintaining inclusivity and wellbeing, and how universities should approach academic freedom in teaching and research under the new legal landscape. Sessions also considered the cultural impact of OfS requirements that institutions must protect speech even when controversial or offensive, and the importance of embedding values of lawful free expression within the broader inclusion, safeguarding and wellbeing agendas.

Religion, identity, and protecting against harassment
The conference was also an opportunity to consider the impact of a proposed new definition of Islamophobia, development of a council on anti-Semitism on freedom of speech in HEIs, and regulation moving forward. Discussion considered how universities can navigate definitions of hate speech and academic freedom, as well as priorities for national frameworks on protection for beliefs, religion and identity, and their interactions with legal duties around speech, harassment and equality moving forward.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from DfE; GLD; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference assessed next steps for degree apprenticeships in England.

It was an opportunity for key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss implications of the Government's introduction of the Growth and Skills Levy to replace the Apprenticeship Levy, alongside establishment of Skills England.

There was also a focus on the way forward for developing degree apprenticeship courses in emerging fields such as engineering, biomedical sciences and media, as well as more widely, to adapt to the UK's evolving labour market and meet skills needs.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on how developments in funding may affect degree apprenticeships and strategic options for adapting to the new funding landscape, particularly in light of the announcement that HEIs will have to fund more of their Level 7 apprenticeships outside of levy funds. Areas for discussion included priorities for advancing effective partnerships between businesses and providers, and what will be needed to underpin the continued growth and accessibility of degree apprenticeships.

Delegates examined potential implications for providers, learners and employers, including the possibility of universities withdrawing from delivering degree apprenticeships. Potential impact on skills gaps across sectors and on social mobility was also considered, particularly for students who lacked access to HE earlier in life.

Further sessions looked at priorities for expanding access to degree apprenticeships, particularly for under-25s, those from ethnic minority backgrounds, people with disabilities, and individuals from disadvantaged communities.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• Growth and Skills Levy: assessing implications of the new levy and impact on degree apprenticeships - strategies for adaptation - potential opportunities
• Level 7 funding changes: effects on providers and employers - addressing factors for potential university withdrawal - skills gaps - impact on public sector training
• Skills England: priorities, role and responsibilities - influence on training availability - skills base monitoring - relationships with stakeholders
• employer training flexibility: spending on non-apprenticeship training - advancing employee development - balancing training needs - impact on public sector training
• social mobility: mitigating possible effects on employees lacking earlier HE access - providing opportunities for underrepresented groups - improving inclusivity in apprenticeships
• business-provider partnerships: learning from effective collaboration - strategies for successful courses - quality and standards - new subjects and emerging fields - course regulation - meeting skills needs
• widening access: priorities for increasing participation for under-25s and underrepresented groups - outreach initiatives
• future funding strategies: encouraging private investment - sustaining Level 7 courses - exploring alternative models - course viability

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from DAERA; DfE; DBT; DWP; DSIT; Dstl; IfATE; HMRC; Department for the Economy, NI; GLD; IPO; OLS; Forestry Commission; DoE, ROI; DFHERIS, ROI; and the Welsh Government.

This conference considered next steps for UK research and innovation, with a focus on investment, strategic development, new institutions and structures, and frameworks for collaboration.

With government recently announcing £13.9bn in funding towards areas such as life sciences, green energy and space, including £8.8bn allocated to UKRI, alongside funding announced in the Autumn Budget, including for the association to Horizon Europe - and the Chancellor’s announcement in the Spring Statement of a boost to defence innovation funding - it was an opportunity to assess the direction of government policy on R&I and priorities for the Spending Review at a time of tightening public finances, as well as how recently announced funding can be utilised.

Delegates focused on the impact of regulation and taxation measures on innovation-focused enterprises. Policy priorities for widening access to investment and the commercialisation of research were also explored, as well as the role of R&I in addressing regional disparities and supporting economic growth. Broader discussion was expected on the Government’s R&I policy, focusing on what constitutes successful outcomes and how these can be effectively measured and monitored.

Strategic options for balancing investment and growth with financial stewardship were examined in the context of budget constraints, looking also at future opportunities and performance indicators for the National Wealth Fund and considering next steps for implementing the forthcoming Industrial Strategy.

Discussion was also expected on proposals set out in UUK’s recently published Opportunity, Growth and Partnership report, with latest thinking on key issues related to funding, research focus areas, collaboration, and student opportunities. Sessions explored what is needed to create a successful R&I ecosystem, stimulate private investment, and enhance partnerships between industry and public institutions, as well as the role of the newly established Regulatory Innovation Office alongside UKRI, ARIA, and DSIT.

Delegates considered implications of the Government’s pledge to introduce 10-year budgets for UKRI and ARIA, and to position DSIT as the digital centre of government. The allocation of funds and processes for applying for support were examined in the context of priority sectors, including aerospace, AI, automotive, defence, energy, and life sciences.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• policy: recently announced funding - Spring Statement support for defence innovation - heightened public spending constraints - Spending Review priorities - HoL Financing and Scaling inquiry
• regulation: role of the newly established Regulatory Innovation Office - next steps for UKRI and ARIA under 10-year funding commitments - implications for long-term research planning
• UK R&I strategy: fostering international competitiveness alongside domestic economic growth - assessing priorities for AI investment - implications of sectoral shifts of focus in R&D
• investment priorities: the future of health sector R&D in the mix - options for expansion, including AI, energy, and defence - strategies for retaining and scaling innovative ventures in the UK
• commercialisation: assessing current tax policy and investment incentives - options for addressing the valley of death growth stage - ensuring the UK’s economic benefit from domestic R&D
• private sector involvement: priorities for an effective National Wealth Fund - concerns around the UK’s declining position in global R&D rankings - strengthening links between HEIs and business
• public-private collaboration: government and business roles in shaping R&I success - optimising policy levers to drive innovation - long-term stability in funding and institutional frameworks
• university funding and research sustainability: challenges posed by financial constraints - impact of rising National Insurance costs - tuition fee adjustments and alternative funding models
• AI: infrastructure and investment priorities - AI Growth Zones and supercomputing expansion - private sector coordination with government priorities - addressing barriers to commercialisation
• global positioning: benchmarking UK policy against international competitors - the impact of geopolitical dynamics - strategic considerations for attracting and retaining foreign investment

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from the DBT; DfT; DAERA, NI; DESNZ; Defra; DHSC; DSIT; DfE; POST; HMRC; FCDO; IPO; MCA; MHCLG; NAO; NWF; Department for the Economy, NI; GO-Science; Ofwat; OLS; Transport Scotland; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focused on priorities and next steps for supporting students with disabilities in higher education, improving their student experience and graduate outcomes.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to discuss key considerations for the Disability in Higher Education Advisory Panel announced by the Office for Students, as it reviews how disabled people are currently supported in HE and formulates guidelines on priorities for improving experience and outcomes. Lucy Merritt, a member of the panel, was a speaker at the seminar. The potential impact of the recent High Court ruling in the Jacob Meagher and Cambridge University High Court Trial for disabled students seeking reasonable adjustments was also considered.

Delegates considered potential reform to the provision of non-medical help funded through the Disabled Students’ Allowance, following DfE’s call for evidence on Improving non-medical support for disabled students in higher education. They examined implications of recent changes introduced by the Student Loans Company, such as the new DSA application process, the involvement of the private sector in delivering needs assessments and assistive technology, and concerns over communication and cohesive provision.

Sessions examined strategies for implementing best practice, enhancing support systems, ensuring equity and financial sustainability of provision, and improving disabled students’ engagement in the HE community. Progress since Disabled Students UK’s Access Insights 2023 report was also assessed, with their more recently published 2024 Access Insights Report finding that approximately 40% of disabled students had their agreed-upon support implemented.

There was also a focus on next steps for the Disabled Student Commitment in light of the Year One Report highlighting that 15 HE providers have signed up so far, looking at approaches and responsibilities for HEIs and local authorities, and how barriers to wider take-up can be addressed.

Further areas for discussion included preparing students for life after HE, looking at priorities for improving recruitment and careers advice, provisions for ongoing study, and opportunities for progression into high-skilled employment and leadership positions. We expected discussion on coordination of policy in this area in light of the Government establishing Skills England, the recently published Get Britain Working white paper and the forthcoming Lifelong Learning Entitlement. With the Public Services Committee recently finding that the disability employment gap has remained at about 30% for the last 10 years, delegates explored the way forward for breaking down barriers to employment and bridging skills shortages.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Katherine Bayliss, Team Leader, Disabled Students’ Allowance, DfE; Lucy Merritt, Education Policy Manager, Thomas Pocklington Trust; and Member, OfS Disability in Higher Education Advisory Panel; Jo Nuckley, Head, Outreach and Insight, OIA; David Thomson, Senior Manager, SLC; and Andrew Hamilton, Disability Lobbyist; Founder, Just Include; and Campaigns Officer, Disabled Students and Carers Association, Durham University.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; DfE, NI; DFHERIS, ROI; DBT; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focused on next steps for improving quality and standards in UK higher education.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders, regulators and policymakers to discuss implementation of the new UK Quality Code issued by the Quality Assurance Agency, and the role of the new Quality Council for UK Higher Education.

Delegates examined strategies and best practice for meeting aims in the code, including ensuring that students have a meaningful say in the quality of their HE experience, against the backdrop of the recent rise in tuition fees announced by the Government and heightened financial pressures on the HE sector. With the code‘s alignment with the Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area, further discussion considered achieving consistency of provision across HEIs, and accommodating variations in expectations and standards across the UK nations.

Sessions assessed how the Quality Council for UK Higher Education will oversee the new code, identifying and implementing systems of best practice. Areas for discussion included ensuring that quality assurance keeps pace with innovation, including increased use of remote and blended learning, as well as maintaining academic integrity and tackling potential challenges facing the sector arising from the impact of AI on teaching and learning.

The agenda also brought out latest thinking on innovative opportunities and best practice in developing high-quality courses across academic and vocational pathways that are challenging and engaging, meet student demands, and can serve the future skills and educational requirements for employment.

Issues for qualifications and assessment were discussed, focusing on tackling grade inflation, and enhancing employer confidence in degree standards and classification. With the code applying to providers operating internationally, delegates also considered transnational education (TNE) quality and priorities moving forward.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• UK Quality Code: strategies and best practice for integrating the new code in HEIs - Quality Council role - alignment with European standards - implementation across UK nations
• regulation: enhancement-led and risk-based approaches - priorities for quality assurance - fostering innovation - lessons from international best practice
• financial pressures: maximising value for money - mitigating financial constraints in course development - equitable resource distribution - supporting diverse HE routes and new providers
• student engagement: frameworks for meaningful input on quality and value - improving communication - involvement in curriculum design - addressing student needs and preferences
• curriculum innovation: anticipating trends, needs and capabilities - next steps for remote and blended learning - future-ready course design - safeguarding quality standards
• AI: tackling challenges for teaching and learning - maintaining academic integrity - updating policies to address AI use - leveraging AI for quality enhancement
• graduate employability: aligning courses and standards with employment needs - building employer confidence - tackling grade inflation - wider strategy for enhancing graduate prospects
• TNE: ensuring standards in international provision - protecting UK HE global reputation - aligning TNE with European standards - quality assurance in franchise provision

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; DBT; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on next steps for policy, regulation and action aimed at improving the prevention of sexual harassment and misconduct within UK HEIs.

Areas for discussion included enhancing support provided to victims, strengthening reporting mechanisms and what best practice should look like moving forward.

The conference brought together policymakers and stakeholders to discuss issues in the context of policy ambitions, laid out by the new Government in the King’s Speech, to introduce a new criminal offence for spiking, and to tackle sexual harassment and violence against women and girls more widely.

It followed the Office for Students’ new registration condition on harassment and sexual misconduct, published in September 2024. Delegates discussed priorities, challenges and best practice for maintaining comprehensive policies and procedures, standardising definitions of harassment and misconduct, and appropriately regulating staff-student relationships.

With the OfS emphasising the importance of multi-agency coordination and inclusivity, we expected the agenda to bring out latest thinking on strategies to improve the safety of university campuses and towns, including enhancing partnerships with policing and mental health services, drawing on best practice and recent stakeholder initiatives.

Attendees considered findings of the OfS’ Sexual Misconduct Prevalence Survey, published in July 2024, which highlighted significant issues regarding staff-student relationships and pressures faced by students. The conference looked at strategies for ensuring understanding among staff and students, and developing better awareness of sexual harassment and misconduct on university campuses, including the future for targeted campaigns.

Sessions examined progress and remaining priorities for strengthening reporting mechanisms and keeping pace with trends in student reports of sexual harassment. Delegates evaluated the effectiveness of whistleblowing policies and protections, complaints processes, and approaches to enhancing institutional transparency and building student and staff confidence in processes, as outlined in Universities UK’s guidance How to handle alleged student misconduct: case studies, published in March 2024. The impact of the ban on HEIs using non-disclosure agreements related to such allegations was also considered.

Further discussion was expected on strategies for improving reputation and influencing cultural change at an institutional level, looking at strengthening leadership and governance to improve accountability, promoting cultural change, and increasing transparency in decision-making processes.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• policy: government plans for legislation on spiking - tackling violence against women and girls - implications for HEIs
• regulation: implementation of the OfS harassment and misconduct conditions - HEI policy clarity and organisation - standardising definitions - addressing emerging trends - data-informed policies
• reporting: opportunities for improving current systems - whistleblowing policies and protection - securing fairness and transparency - building student and staff confidence
• staff-student relationships: addressing issues highlighted in the OfS’s prevalence survey - setting clear boundaries - promoting awareness including targeted campaigns
• promoting positive change: strengthening leadership and accountability - promoting cultural shifts - increasing transparency in decision-making
• campus safety: implementing multi-agency approaches - enhancing mental health support - fostering inclusivity on campus
• off-campus safety: strategies and practical measures - partnerships with local services and communities - non-university student accommodation - the role of HEIs in wider community safety
• collaboration: improving coordination with police and mental health services - joint-university pledges - sharing best practice

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates.

This conference considered next steps for widening higher education access and participation in the UK, and strategies for improving outcomes for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Sessions in the agenda examined how best to address the perceived participation gap and improve access to university for those from disadvantaged backgrounds, with UUK proposing to set a new target of 70% participation in tertiary education for 25 year-olds by 2040, an increase from the current goal of 49%. The conference also came in light of the Government’s recent announcement of plans to raise maximum tuition fees to £9,535 whilst also implementing an inflation-linked rise in maintenance loans, which was met with overall mixed response from the education sector, with the ASCL warning that the rise may deter students from disadvantaged backgrounds from applying to university.

Stakeholders and policymakers assessed progress on implementing the updated access and participation plans (APPs) mandated by the Office for Students. Areas for discussion include the processes involved, along with challenges and best practice for HEIs meeting requirements, issues around reducing administrative burden, and defining and monitoring the success of strategies.

We expected discussion to bring out best practice and latest strategies for student recruitment, selection, admission and onboarding, looking at increasing diversity and attracting underrepresented groups to higher education, with recent statistics following A-level results day showing that regional disparities in England still exist despite a record-high number of students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds gaining places at university. Delegates also considered strategies for tackling financial barriers, the potential effects of the rise in tuition fees and maintenance loans, drop-out rates, and better supporting students to achieve their potential.

It was also an opportunity to discuss the implementation of requirements for sector-agreed quality practice outlined in QAA’s recently published Quality Code for Higher Education.

Priorities for HEI collaboration with FE and schools were discussed, alongside strategies for improving study and careers guidance and support for students. We expected discussion on the future of technical and vocational routes, including proposals from the Government for a Growth and Skills Levy.

The agenda also looked at the way forward for aligning participation strategies with skills needs. Sessions considered access to non-traditional options, including degree apprenticeships and upskilling. Delegates will also discuss opportunities for mature learners and the future of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement, along with improved provision of part-time, distanced and flexible courses.

Discussion was also expected to draw on UUK’s recent Opportunity, growth and partnership: a blueprint for change report calling for a system-wide effort to increase access and improve student progression into the labour market. Delegates considered recommendations such as a tertiary education opportunity fund, action by universities and government to increase teacher supply, and reinstating maintenance grants for students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Ben Jordan, Director, Strategy, UCAS; Dr Rachel Carr, CEO, IntoUniversity; Dr Omar Khan, CEO, TASO; and Dr Andrew Ross, Head, Widening Access and Participation, University of Bath.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• access and participation in HE: assessing the current landscape and next steps
• APPs: examining the development process - optimising their utility
• addressing barriers: achieving positive outcomes for students - tackling drop-out rates - diversifying student intake - addressing student financial burdens - support into the job market
• collaboration with FE and schools: student information, guidance and support - technical and vocational routes - improving relationships and developing whole-system approaches
• expanding and diversifying routes into HE: new skills and employment policy - meeting local needs - upskilling - mature learners - flexible provision - non-traditional options - LLE rollout
• priorities: improving access to higher education moving forward

All delegates were able to contribute, alongside key policy officials, to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; Department for the Economy, NI; MHCLG; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference examined priorities and next steps for Higher Technical Qualifications (HTQs) in England, including what is currently working for the sector and what could be improved.

It was an opportunity to look at the rollout of new HTQs in September 2024 and ahead to further rollout in 2025 as part of the phased implementation in England, introducing business, health, STEM, advisory and service sector qualifications.

The conference followed the recent launch of Skills England which will be established in phases over the next 9-12 months, with aims to increase collaboration between businesses and the education sector and change the way young people are trained. Delegates looked at priorities for the new body, drawing on its first report Skills England: Driving growth and widening opportunities published in September 2024, as well as for reforming the Apprenticeship Levy to become the Growth and Skills Levy in light of the £40m investment announced in the Budget.

Those attending assessed next steps for HTQs following IfATE’s consultation earlier this year, which sought views on how to strengthen technical skills at levels 4 to 6, and on which HTQs could be eligible for funding under the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE).

Sessions in the agenda examined IfATE’s proposals for a greater range of approval categories, with the aim of accommodating a broader choice of technical qualifications at levels 4 to 6. There was discussion on next steps for shaping inclusive future training programmes, increasing the range of occupational routes, meeting green skill needs and improving employer collaboration to meet learner demand.

Those attending discussed latest thinking on improving the quality of provision and range of courses on offer, and offering more flexible and modular learning in light of IfATE’s consultation on the LLE, as well as the way forward for improving outcomes for both students and employers.

Ways that uptake could be boosted were also considered, following the Skills Commission finding a widespread lack of understanding of HTQs and their distinctiveness from apprenticeships among learners, parents, education providers and employers.

We also expected wider discussion on how to tackle barriers to HTE uptake, including strategies for promoting better awareness, and addressing concerns surrounding perceived financial disincentives for employers and individuals to pursue HTQs as an option due to uncertainty around their value for employability.

The agenda also looked at key issues for employers, and implications for the economy and skills pipeline. Delegates assessed the impact of the new Government’s proposed reforms to the Apprenticeship Levy and options for giving employers greater flexibility in the use of the Levy to include HTQs. Delegates discussed wider post-16 strategy proposals, including the establishment of Skills England body to bring together business, training providers and unions to deliver the Industrial Strategy, and the role of the £300m of funding in the Budget to help young people develop skills in further education.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Peter Myant, Head, Higher Technical Education Strategy and Growth, DfE, Graham Hasting-Evans, CEO, NOCN Group; and report Co-Chair, Higher Technical Qualifications: How to Liberate Employers & Skill Workers for the Future; Imran Tahir, Research Economist, Institute for Fiscal Studies; Alex Hall-Chen, Principal Policy Advisor for Sustainability, Skills, and Employment, Institute of Directors; and Emma Roberts, Director, External Affairs, WorldSkills UK.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; IfATE; DWP; DBT; HMPPS; NAO; ONS; IPO; DFHERIS, ROI; DfE, NI; DESNZ; DSIT; DfC, NI; MOJ; OLS; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed the financial stability, resilience and sustainability of the UK HE sector.

With the recent Government announcement that tuition fees will rise in line with inflation to £9,535 from October next year for new and existing students, it was an opportunity to discuss the impact of this increased income generation on the financial stability of HE institutions.

The conference also followed the publication of updated analysis from the Office for Students, Financial sustainability of higher education providers in England, outlining concerns surrounding university recruitment of both home and international students. The analysis anticipates a net income reduction of £3,445 by 2025-26, with a sector level deficit of -£1,636m, with up to 72% of providers being in deficit, and 40% having low liquidity. Stakeholders and delegates assessrf the impact of these figures on long-term financial planning in HEIs and priorities for sector stability moving forward.

Bringing stakeholders together with policymakers, sessions considered concerns that the increased funding received will be cancelled out by the increase in employer national insurance contributions announced in the recent Budget, and that some universities might not be able to receive the higher rate of tuition fee for existing students due to contractual differences.

Following the Government also announcing it will bring forward wider proposed reforms for the HE sector next year, and with calls from the sector for a more long-term solution to addressing financial challenges, delegates discussed potential opportunities for HE funding changes in next year’s spending review and the future for tuition fees beyond 2025/26.

With the Secretary of State for Education emphasising that increased income generation from tuition fees next year should be used to improve university access and increase efficiencies within HE institutions, delegates exploreed options and strategies for utilising extra income. We also expected discussion on the impact of fee increases on people applying to attend university, with universities expressing concern of rising fees acting as a deterrent to potential applicants, and the role of maintenance loan increases in supporting effected groups to be able to afford to attend university.

The conference also followed the recent announcement that the role of the Office for Students will be refocussed to prioritise the financial stability of the HE sector, alongside delivery of improved quality and outcomes for students. It was an opportunity to examine key issues and the unprecedented challenges facing the sector in the context of the recently published Fit for the Future: Independent Review of the Office for Students, led by Sir David Behan. The report made recommendations for the OfS, Government and HE sector to consider, including on the development of sustainable funding models, transparency, support for at-risk institutions and enhanced financial oversight.

It also came with the publication of University UK’s Blueprint for the future of the HE sector, which argued for a hybrid system to secure the immediate financial future of the sector and over the longer-term. It also calls for reviews of teaching models and university research, greater use of AI, new group structures based on the University of London model and increased collaboration to save costs.

We also expected discussion on implications for financial stability in the HE sector of findings in:

• the Higher Education Statistics Agency’s key financial indicators for 2022/2023 - showing a significant number of HEIs are now in deficit
• HEPI’s Undergraduate fees revisited report, which proposes a 10-point plan to strengthen the system, including introducing a 20-year repayment term on student loans and a minimum student loan repayment of £10 per week after graduation

Delegates assessed what is needed from regulators, government and the sector itself to effectively identify and respond to emerging financial risks, and develop regulatory frameworks that provide clarity on the conditions for intervention and support, as well as options for future funding settlements that work for universities, staff, students and the taxpayer.

Further sessions brought out discussion on next steps for UK HEI business models, and latest developments in wider initiatives aimed at restructuring and diversifying income streams to improve the sector’s resilience, including approaches to strategic business partnerships and the commercialisation of research.

We also expected discussion on further priorities for the sector as HEIs seek to address financial concerns, including:

• student numbers: strategies and best practice for sustaining enrolment levels - impact of increased tuition fees on student recruitment - role of increasing maintenance loans in line with inflation in supporting effected groups to afford university
• UK HE in a global market: maintaining the UK’s competitiveness as an international study destination whilst reducing reliance on international students
• regulation: options for working with government and the regulator to reduce regulatory burdens and develop a future funding settlement
• risk management: establishing an improved early warning system for identifying emerging challenges
• sector collaboration: proactive sharing of intelligence and data between institutions
• economic pressures: mitigating impacts of inflation and wider pressures on operating costs
• HE estates: latest thinking on improving cost-efficiency for estates maintenance and development, and investment to reduce carbon emissions
• future policy: options for long-term funding reform - opportunities for next year’s spending review - future for tuition fees beyond 2025/26

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; NAO; DSIT; IPO; GO-Science; Home Office; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined key issues for the future of student accommodation in the UK.

It brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to discuss priorities for policy, and for the higher education sector, students, housing providers and local authorities.

Key areas for discussion included options for policy and stakeholders in addressing concerns surrounding the supply of student accommodation and rising costs, with The Times highlighting a 230,000 student bed shortage in the UK. 

Delegates assessed the potential impact of the recently published Renters’ Rights Bill which aims to offer greater protections to those in rented accommodation, looking at implications for landlords and students, and the supply of privately-rented student housing amid concern that measures in the Bill such as the proposed bans on ‘no fault’ section 21 evictions and fixed term tenancies do not account for the specific nature of student rentals.

Those attending also looked more widely at the student housing market, with latest thinking on implications of increased demand alongside current and emerging market trends in the supply of university-provided accommodation, including halls of residence, and Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA).

The agenda also looked at strategies for mitigating the impact of supply and cost concerns on student experience, as well as the effect on participation in HE and HEI applications.

We expected discussion on progress in implementation of the Student Accommodation Code of Practice, and the potential effect of planning system reform outlined in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill on provision of student accommodation moving forward.

Overall, issues for discussion on the current student housing model and priorities moving forward included:

• supply:
  
  • strategic options for meeting the demand for both privately and HEI-supplied accommodation - reducing the gap between supply and demand - the supply and provision of PBSA
  • addressing the impact of HEI financial pressures on accommodation supply and affordability - options for construction and operation cost reduction - delivering value for money
• standards and best practice:
  
  • progress and impact of the Student Accommodation Code of Practice - university uptake - remaining priorities for improving student housing quality and standards
  • broadening choice - alternative accommodation provision and options - House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) opportunities
• policy: potential impact of proposals in the Renters’ Rights Bill on off-campus, multi-occupancy, privately-rented home supply - implications for the student housing market - regulatory priorities going forward
• student finances: cost of living issues for students related to housing - impact on student access to accommodation away from home and decisions to progress into HE - value for money
• student experience: meeting the needs of different student groups, including international students and those with disabilities - priorities for improving student satisfaction and wellbeing
• collaboration: strengthening government, local authority, HEI and private sector partnerships - improving system efficiency to deliver sustainable accommodation solutions
• housing market: ways in which the demand for student housing is impacting the wider housing market - the way forward for utilising local housing data

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from MHCLG; DHSC; Department for the Economy, NI; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference examined next steps for improving student mental health in universities.

It brought together key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss priorities for student mental health support in HEIs and how to improve existing provision moving forward.

Sessions in the agenda examined the direction of policy under the new Government following the target for all HEIs to have signed up to the University Mental Health Charter Programme by September 2024. Implementation of the renewed MHCP was considered, alongside key areas for research and the way forward for collaboration and sharing best practice to improve mental health at a university and UK-wide level. We also expected discussion on implications for HEIs of provisions in the Mental Health Bill, including giving increased rights and autonomy to users of mental health services.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Jane Harris, Chair, Mental Wellbeing in Higher Education Expert Group; Dr Omar Khan, CEO, Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education; Yeme Onoabhagbe, Interim CEO, Student Minds; Nicola Turner, Senior Fair Access Adviser, UCAS; and Dr Emma Roberts, Head, Law, University of Salford.

Alongside looking at initiatives in individual universities, delegates assessed progress made by the Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce. They also examined key areas for improvement in the context of additional funding, guidance and support being rolled out across the HE sector, and the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health.

The conference brought out latest thinking on addressing factors leading to the rise in mental health conditions among young people in HEIs, including workload pressures, online harms, financial stresses and the aftermath of the pandemic. Discussion explored the potential effects on mental health in HEIs following the Government’s inflation-linked increase of tuition fees and maintenance loans from next year, with a recent Save the Students survey showing 60% of university students reporting that money worries had impacted their mental health. Sessions also explored strategies for supporting the transition into HE, including providing students with the necessary skills to adjust to the new environment.

Delegates considered how variation in the quality of mental health service provision in HEIs can be addressed. They examined best practice in how HE providers are embedding mental health support strategies into their governance structures, including processes for identifying those at risk, providing tailored interventions, and best practice in compassionate communication and case management.

In examining the case for a statutory duty of care for HE students, delegates considered potential implications, looking at strategies for increasing guidance and training for non-specialist staff, and improving information sharing between educational settings, agencies and support services.

There was also a focus on effective partnerships between HEIs, local services and health providers, with latest thinking on practicalities of collaboration and data sharing, and how to further improve multi-agency coordination.

We expected further discussionson on the future direction of policy to improve mental health support, including evaluation of existing frameworks such as Student Minds’ Student Space support service, and Universities UK’s Suicide-Safer Universities programme, alongside closer working between HEIs and the NHS.

Areas for discussion in the agenda included:

• implementing the Mental Health Charter: progress towards targets for HEI participation - challenges in adopting a whole-university approach - benefits and impact of the Charter Programme
• taskforce priorities: findings from the Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce - next steps for enhancing mental health and suicide prevention - implications for HE providers
• suicide prevention strategies: developing guidance to restrict access to means - integrating new policies into university settings - addressing online harms and digital access
• information sharing: overcoming barriers between schools, colleges and universities - exploring methods for data sharing - balancing student privacy with support needs
• funding and resources: allocation and impact of government funding - supporting transitions from school to university - expanding counselling and mental health services
• staff training: enhancing guidance and training for non-specialist staff - promoting mental health awareness among faculty - standardising training practices across the sector
• duty of care: examining the potential for a statutory duty of care - implications for HE providers and students - learning from recent high-profile cases
• embedding support strategies: integrating mental health into university governance - identifying at-risk students - implementing tailored interventions and compassionate communications
• collaboration and partnerships: improving multi-agency coordination - building effective partnerships with local services and health providers - practicalities of collaboration and data sharing
• evaluating existing frameworks: assessing Student Space, Suicide Safer Universities, and NHS-HEI mental health partnerships - identifying areas for improvement - future policy directions

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DHSC; DfE; DAERA, NI; DftE, NI, DoH, NI; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focuseed on the future use of AI in higher education, bringing out latest thinking on maintaining academic integrity, as well as opportunities that the new technology presents for teaching and learning.

It was an opportunity for key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss implications of recent developments, such as the QAA’s Navigating the complexities of the artificial intelligence era in higher education report, which highlighted opportunities for the sector, including increasing accessibility, supporting those with additional learning needs, and improving flexibility and productivity in learning. Delegates also discussed potential challenges AI presents to the sector, such as decreasing the digital divide, guaranteeing accessibility, addressing infrastructure issues within universities and managing integration. Nick Watmough, Quality Enhancement and Standards Specialist, QAA, delivered a keynote address at the seminar.

Delegates considered AI’s impact on student learning, development, creativity and achievement. Strategies for effectively integrating AI into HE were examined, focusing on enhancing teaching methods, staff and student academic relationships, supporting different learning needs, and improving administrative efficiency.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on best practice and the positive potential of increased use of AI, including on academic staff time and university finances in the short-term. Areas for discussion included its use in routine operations, such as application processing, timetabling and providing student support, as well as predictive analytics to optimise utilisation of facilities and teaching staff. Longer-term planning, adaptive learning and assessment systems will also be looked at.

The conference assessed approaches to maintaining academic integrity in the age of AI, including regulatory and institutional measures to deter misuse of AI tools and address academic misconduct. Attendees discussed priorities for developing fair and proportionate guidelines for addressing suspected cases of AI-related misconduct, including the use of AI detection tools, and standardising sanctions.

Sessions considered how HEIs are rethinking assessment strategies in light of generative AI, exploring best practice in assessment design, and updating academic integrity policies and fostering transparent communication between students and staff.

Further discussion was expected on leveraging AI to widen participation in HE and tackle the digital divide, and ensuring equitable access to technological advancements.

The conference also looked at how HEIs can respond swiftly to technological innovations by implementing policies and structures that keep pace with AI developments, as well as key considerations for the sector following confirmation in the Budget of the forthcoming Artificial Intelligence Opportunities Action Plan, which will support the Government in utilising AI opportunities and foster growth.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• ethical AI integration: developing guidelines for responsible use of AI in HE - fostering an ethical culture among staff and students - balancing innovation with academic integrity
• policy development: creating effective institutional policies for AI adoption - aligning with regulatory standards - ensuring consistent implementation across departments
• staff and student training: equipping educators with AI competencies - integrating AI literacy into curricula - promoting awareness of AI’s capabilities and limitations
• assessment methods: re-evaluating assessment strategies with AI in mind - exploring alternative models to traditional assessments - maintaining academic standards amidst technological change
• academic misconduct: detecting and preventing AI-assisted cheating - implementing fair and proportionate sanctions - promoting a culture of honesty and transparency
• equity and access: addressing the digital divide in AI adoption - ensuring all students have access to necessary AI tools - supporting underrepresented and disadvantaged groups
• AI for inclusivity: leveraging AI to support disabled students - personalising learning experiences - enhancing student engagement and outcomes
• data privacy: safeguarding personal data in AI applications - understanding legal and ethical implications - establishing secure data management practices
• sector collaboration: fostering partnerships between institutions, policymakers, and industry - sharing best practice - driving innovation in AI-enhanced education
• future readiness: preparing institutions for ongoing AI advancements - developing agile strategies - anticipating future challenges and opportunities

All delegates were able to contribute, alongside key policy officials, to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DFHERIS, ROI; Education Scotland; and DAERA, NI.

This conference focused on next steps for growing the UK’s role in international research and R&D collaboration.

It was an opportunity to assess the way forward for increasing UK research capabilities and expanding international partnerships to help meet global challenges.

With innovation cited by the new Government as a key enabler for achieving ambitions for economic growth, alongside a focus on improved relationships with the EU and globally - but set against financial constraints - delegates discussed how these tensions can best be addressed in the context of international research strategy. We also expected discussion on how financial challenges being experienced by HEIs could impact the UK contribution to international research.

Delegates discussed how government and regulators can work with stakeholders to:

• structure longer R&D funding cycles proposed by the Government, stimulate private investment, and improve partnerships with industry
• identify opportunities for support from the National Wealth Fund, the Industrial Strategy and reforms to the planning system
• expand skills in key sectors identified by the Government, such as aerospace, AI, automotive, defence, energy and life sciences

In light of the UK’s re-association with the EU-funded Horizon Europe and Copernicus programmes on the same terms as member states, attendees discussed how to further boost research participation and maximise the benefits of renewed partnerships. They also discussed how the UK can continue to promote its added value as a member and contribute to shaping policy priorities for the next funding programmes.

We expected the conference to bring out latest thinking on identifying and forging new international partnerships, including with the Global South, following the recent G7 Science and Technology Ministerial agreeing shared commitments to strengthen international collaboration and boost research, as well as to move forward R&D cooperation with Africa.

Further areas for discussion included strategies for maintaining the UK’s attractiveness as a research destination, how best to harness the UK’s established research clusters, and options for hosting a new international research facility, as well as attracting global talent and improving researcher mobility while retaining expertise within the UK.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include officials from DBT; DfE; DSIT; UKRI; UKSIN; Defra; Dstl; IPO; HMRC; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DHSC; EA; FCDO; FSA; GO-Science; IPO; UKHSA; UKSA; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference discussed how to improve graduate outcomes and employability in the UK.

Key stakeholders and policymakers examined approaches to ensuring that the range of courses being offered by UK HEIs addresses both skills demands in the UK job market and wider societal needs.

It took place in the context of changing perceptions of the value of different degrees amongst HEIs, students and employers - with the Institute of Student Employers Student Development Survey 2024 finding increasing reports from employers of graduates and apprentices leaving for better pay.

The conference was an opportunity to discuss the direction of policy under the new Government, with commitments to:

• establish Skills England and put in place a guarantee of access to training, an apprenticeship, or support to find work for all 18-21 year-olds
• devolve adult skills funding to Combined Authorities
• improve engagement with employers in the skills system, with the aim of growing the quality of training and employment opportunities

Recruitment priorities for employers were discussed, looking at implications of recent trends in the perception of desirable skills from university courses and ongoing issues surrounding the concept of ‘low value degrees’, and the role of HE courses in addressing skills gaps in the job market moving forward.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on strategies designed to measure degree value and incorporate student input into course content and structures, as well as the potential for new ways of measuring graduate outcomes moving forward.

Those attending also looked at the impact a student’s experience at university has on graduate outcomes, including how universities prepare students with the knowledge, soft skills, and experience necessary to secure employment after graduation.

It was an opportunity to assess the impact of increased focus on employability within curriculum design in recent years on improving graduate employment prospects and influencing student choices. Sessions also considered how to improve the university outcomes of those from disadvantaged backgrounds, through tailoring careers advice, increasing mentoring and networking opportunities, targeting specific groups and partnering with employers.

There was further discussion on strategies for strengthening university careers services and best practice in helping students into employment, including raising awareness of career opportunities and pathways. Delegates considered how the latest iteration of the TEF and the release of LEO data is impacting universities’ decision-making around employability and investment in careers guidance services.

Further sessions considered how best to retain the UK’s attractiveness as a study and work destination for international students, with discussion on employment opportunities for filling labour market skills gaps and contribution to the economy more widely, as well as looking forward to future policy options for graduate visas, in light of the Migration Advisory Committee’s recent recommendation that this visa route remain in place.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from DfE; DHSC; DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DFHERIS, ROI; DPENDR, ROI; GLD; MOD; RAF; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on key developments and next steps for strengthening the relationship between universities and their local communities.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to discuss latest thinking on priority areas in which HEIs can contribute to their communities, strategy and best practice for implementing effective civic roles, and the way forward for measuring the impact of partnerships between local government, businesses and universities.

The conference was also a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss the issues in the context of policy ambitions laid out by the new Government for creating a secure future for higher education.

Delegates discussed latest thinking on areas where the involvement of universities in their communities can have the most beneficial local impact, including outreach and mentoring for SMEs, schools and colleges, and support for employment, communities and regeneration, as well as key sectors such as the creative industries.

Those attending also looked at cost-benefit for universities, examining options for incentivising HEIs to contribute to local growth while reducing unnecessary associated administration and bureaucracy.

It was an opportunity to discuss next steps for the National Civic Impact Accelerator (NCIA) and the Action Learning Programme (ALP), with 12 civic university partnerships aiming to accelerate the local social and economic impact of UK universities. Delegates assessed what has been learnt so far from evidence gathering by NCIA to establish what works, share innovation, and provide universities with the framework and tools to effectively contribute to communities.

The agenda also included discussion on priorities for driving universities’ public and community engagement, and working with the public and third sectors, which was a focus of KEF3, with results for individual universities published in September 2023, as well as the role of HEIs in local innovation and regional regeneration.

Further sessions looked at funding for local HEI research projects, including identifying and securing sources of revenue for long-term regional projects, as well as best practice for applying funds to effectively achieve key outcomes.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Alice Frost, Director, Knowledge Exchange, UKRI; Richard Brabner, Director, ESG, UPP; and Executive Chair, UPP Foundation; Adam Leach, Programme Director, National Civic Impact Accelerator; and Greg Wade, Head, Innovation Policy, Universities UK.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; DLUHC; Defra; DBT; DSIT; Dstl; Department for the Economy, NI; IPO; DAERA, NI; DoH, NI; GO-Science; MOJ; UKHSA; HMPPS; HMRC; Home Office; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.

This conference examined next steps for university spin-outs and licencing deals.

It was a timely opportunity for delegates to consider this and wider issues around commercialisation of academic research as the new parliament begins following the General Election.

Delegates assessed latest thinking and best practice, in light of the government’s response accepting all recommendations from the Independent review of university spin-out companies in November 2023, which included:

• a £20m fund to support the foundation of more spin-out companies based on academic research at UK universities
• standardising and quickening the spin-out creation process
• building upon the TenU University Spin-out Investment Terms Guide by recommending 10-25% university equity for life sciences spin-outs and 10% or less for sectors which are less IP intensive

Those attending also examined timelines for implementing innovation-friendly commercialisation policies, following UKRI’s circular letter in February 2024. The letter outlined their interim approach to streamlining university spin-out development, with measures including the publication of an Addendum for HEIs in spring 2024, and continued collaboration with HESA to improve data sets and information transfer between HEIs and investors.

Delegates considered what best practice looks like in regard to future structuring of spin-outs and the relationship between universities and companies, as well as examining industry imperatives for sustaining funding through the scale-up stage of development. Discussion also considered how the UK can maintain competitiveness in comparison to other countries in this area.

Further sessions explored the future for government funding and how best to utilise increased investment, with discussion on the potential for changes in the political landscape affecting funding allocation, and how university research departments can prepare.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Alice Frost, Director, Knowledge Exchange, Research England; Professor Irene Tracey CBE, FRS, FMedSci, Vice-Chancellor, University of Oxford (pre-recorded presentation); Dr Todd Davey, Associate Partner, University Industry Innovation Network; Dr Mairi Gibbs, Chief Operating Officer, Oxford University Innovation; and Dr Christine Martin, Head, Ventures, Cambridge Enterprise.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• key priorities: implementing recommendations from the Independent Review - moving policy and higher education sector practice forward
• spin-out creation: assessing efficiency and establishing a blueprint for licensing deals - approaches to IP - equity shares - support from the founding institution - reducing bureaucracy to quicken the process
• improving the data pool: future direction for improving data sets around spin-out creation - the process of data collection - CRNs and the vision for a comprehensive database of UK spin-outs
• investment and scaling-up: the role of angel and venture funding in early-stage growth and throughout the scale-up process - overcoming barriers academics face when pursuing commercial interests
• terms between HEIs and innovators: equity stakes in spin-out companies and their impact on further investment - considering what is fair for both parties - examples of effective collaboration
• best practice: standards in the UK and internationally - developing investor-friendly value propositions - assembling strong start-up teams - securing patient capital
• widening participation: increasing the geographic spread of successful spin-outs - encouraging investment beyond the South East of England - examining the role of spin-outs in the levelling up agenda
• diversity: priorities for diversifying spin-out leadership teams - addressing structural barriers for female spin-out founders

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DBT; DfE; Defra; DAERA, NI; DHSC; DSIT; DESNZ; DfT; GO-Science; HMRC; IPO; Department for the Economy, NI; Education Scotland; UKHSA; UKSA; and The Scottish Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.

This conference looked at priorities and best practice for integration of technological advancements into long-term plans by higher education institutions for educational provision and environmental sustainability.

It was an opportunity to discuss key issues at a time of heightened focus on this area of policy in the run up to the General Election.

As HEIs invest in digital infrastructure, delegates considered next steps for the incorporation of digital technology into structures for course design, and key issues for implementation.

Attendees assessed the potential for digital technology and GenAI programmes to facilitate creative teaching and learning models, widen participation in HE, and reduce staff workloads.

Delegates discussed best practice for rollout and use, while retaining quality and academic integrity in all aspects of teaching and learning. It followed DfE’s response to a call for evidence on the role of Generative AI in Education, which highlighted concerns over standards and the potential for aspects of learning, assessment and feedback to be undermined.

Delegates examined opportunities and challenges around staff training and adoption, as well as what students and employers need in the design and delivery of digital courses, with discussion on the effectiveness of digital learning in preparing graduates for the requirements of the labour market moving forward.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on key issues around lecture recording and implications of increased digitisation for teaching staff and their rights, and for the nature of academic work.

Delegates considered digital inequalities and wider policy implications for the expansion of digital education. It came with the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s Digital exclusion 2023 report highlighting the importance of balancing increased investment with plans for digital inclusion.

Sessions looked at further opportunities for supporting strategic national and global policy objectives going forward in areas such as sustainability and reducing inequalities, and developing international collaborative relationships, as well as what can be learned from approaches to the adoption of tech in HE in other countries.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Heidi Fraser-Krauss, Chief Executive Officer, JISC; Mary Curnock Cook, Chair, Dyson Institute and Pearson Education; Sue Bagguley, Head of Business Development and Digital Enterprise Sales, Siemens Digital Industries; and Jack Tasker, Business Engagement Partner, Birmingham Digital Futures, University of Birmingham.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DfE; NCSC; Education Scotland; Department for the Economy, NI; HMPPS; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focuseed on the future of knowledge exchange in the UK.

Delegates examined the direction, development and use of knowledge exchange metrics, looking at priorities for policy and funding to support the UK’s continued evolution as a centre for knowledge exchange.

The conference followed the release of KEF3 in September 2023, which emphasised the role of commercial collaborations in generating economic returns for university research departments.

Those attending considered steps being taken by educational institutions and funding bodies to improve the quality and quantity of knowledge exchange within and between HEIs.

They discussed:

• KEF3’s current use of metrics for informing its seven perspectives, and its five quintile mode of assessment
• enhancing processes for knowledge exchange within the context of Research England’s 2022-2025 Strategic Delivery Plan, including:
  
  • Research England’s review of knowledge exchange funding, and consultations launched in 2022-2023 regarding best methods for enhancing modes of exchange
  • collaboration between Research England and HESA to expand the national database for spin-out companies

Further sessions assessed approaches for developing innovative knowledge exchange strategies within universities and improving university-business collaboration.

It followed government responses to both the Independent Review of University Spin-out Companies, published by DSIT and HM Treasury in November 2023, and the Research, Development and Innovation Organisational Landscape: Independent Review, led by Sir Paul Nurse.

The Government concurred with recommendations from both reviews on a need to improve mobility between areas of innovation in UK universities, and to maintain Britain’s competitiveness as a centre for international talent and knowledge exchange practices by increasing collaborations with commercial partners.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Ellen Bamford, Head of Knowledge Exchange Data and Evidence, Research England; Tomas Ulrichsen, Director, Policy Evidence Unit for University Commercialisation and Innovation, University of Cambridge; Dan Cook, Deputy Director, Higher Education Statistics Agency; Professor Arlene Holmes-Henderson, Professor of Classics Education and Public Policy, Durham University; and Graeme Dey MSP, Minister for Higher and Further Education, The Scottish Government (pre-recorded contribution).

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• creating impactful knowledge exchange strategies - encouraging innovation and collaboration between HEIs and external partners
• how best to utilise the full breadth of HEI knowledge exchange approaches - improving the targeting of funding and the UK’s framework for knowledge exchange metrics
• assessing results of KEF3 - what can be learned from developing trends - priorities and options for provider inclusion in later iterations
• exploring how the public benefit of knowledge exchange in R&I can be maximised, including for levelling up ambitions

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DLUHC; DSIT; GO-Science; IPO; UKAEA; UKHSA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on next steps for the implementation of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE).

Following the Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Act being granted royal assent in September 2023, it was an opportunity to bring policymakers, regulators and stakeholders together to assess the timeline for implementation following the recent DfE announcement that the teaching of courses funded by the LLE will now be delayed until January 2026, and what each stage means for the higher education sector.

Discussion considered:

• developing effective student engagement, the role of the LLE in widening participation in HE and increasing social mobility, and enabling workers to upskill through LLE whilst in employment
• the impact of the LLE allowing those in employment to study modular HE courses
• the eligibility of courses under LLE, as well as the £5m scheme launched by the Government to encourage HEIs to deliver Higher Technical Qualifications (HTQ) in a more flexible manner
• key challenges for the sector in supporting modular learning under LLE, implications for quality of provision, and potential changes to course structure and delivery of qualifications
• collaboration between the Department for Education and the wider sector to ensure effective implementation of LLE and alignment of priorities

Delegates also examined the relationship between LLE and the current funding models for HEI finances and what this will look like in the future, including the suitability of the allotted £37k per student for studies, and the sustainability of this figure moving forward.

There was also discussion on proposed reform to the current fee structure to be proportional to the amount of credits offered over the course of study, and the impact of limiting costs.

Further sessions assessed the student experience studying under LLE, looking at next steps for appealing effectively to mature students, and for utilising the LLE to create pathways for students to continue their studies post-16 and to widen participation in higher education.

We are pleased to have been be able to include keynote sessions with: Karl Anderson, Head of Qualifications Policy, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Kim Eccleston, Head of Strategy & Reform and Delivery Lead for LLE, UCAS; Andy Forbes, Head of Development, ResPublica; and Helena Vine, Lead Policy Officer, England, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; IfATE; DFHERIS, ROI; DBT; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; HMPPS; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed priorities and next steps for the development, regulation and provision of degree apprenticeships in England.

It followed the Office for Students recently committing funding to increase the number of degree apprenticeship courses available in HEIs, as part of a wider commitment over the next two years to increase access and expand provision.

Delegates discussed the affordability of the Apprenticeship Levy, amidst concerns that it is being increasingly used to fund degree apprenticeships for older employees, while spending on level 2 and 3 apprenticeships for younger people has fallen.

Delegates also considered the role of degree apprenticeships in social mobility and wider access and participation plans for universities, looking at priorities for improving the diversity of those undertaking degree apprenticeships and outreach to those from underrepresented backgrounds.

Further sessions examined what will be needed to harness opportunities for degree apprenticeships in contributing to levelling up, green skills development and wider policy aims.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Darren Shaw, Head of Community of Practice, Assessment and Assurance, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Philippa Alway, Senior Policy Adviser, Apprenticeships and Skills, UCAS; Mandy Crawford-Lee, Chief Executive, University Vocational Awards Council; and Rowan Fisher, Head of Student Experience and Skills Policy, Universities UK.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• progress: learning from areas of success and best practice - key issues - applications and admissions - provision and awarding of degree apprenticeships in England moving forward
• uptake: assessing key trends - priorities for careers guidance and raising awareness - options for expanded HEI offers - the Apprenticeship Levy - improving options for SMEs
• transition: moving from courses at level 2 and 3 and T Levels to degree apprenticeships - enhancing progression pathways
• access: improving student diversity - outreach to underrepresented groups - retention and progression - role in social mobility, upskilling, and regional economies and labour markets
• options for universities: continuing to evolve and grow apprenticeship offers - improving the commercial sustainability of degree apprenticeship courses for universities
• collaboration: moving forward relationships between course providers and employers - best practice in collaborative frameworks
• standards: ensuring overall quality of qualifications being awarded - improving student retention rates - regulatory priorities

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the Cabinet Office; DBT; DfE; DFHERIS, ROI; Department for the Economy, NI; DHSC; DLUHC; DSIT; DWP; GLD; HMRC; Home Office; IfATE; Ofcom; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined the way forward for freedom of speech in higher education institutions in the UK.

It brought together stakeholders, regulators and policymakers to discuss the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, which aims to ensure that universities promote freedom of speech as a fundamental value.

Coming as the Office for Students’ (OfS) conducts a consultation on new guidance for HEIs in fulfilling their free speech duties ahead of implementation this August, delegates assessed implications of the legislation for the HE sector, its staff and students. It was an opportunity to consider the roles of stakeholders and policy in setting and implementing boundaries for discussion in higher education settings, and in society more widely.

The agenda also looked at the potential impact of the OfS new free speech complaints scheme on campus culture, academic freedom, teaching and research, as the OfS consults on the scheme and the future regulation of student unions.

As HEIs prepare for the Act to come into effect, delegates examined implementation of key measures, including the expanded legal obligations of institutions and student unions (SUs) to secure and promote freedom of speech for staff, members and students, as well as visiting speakers.

Delegates discussed the definition of new duties and conditions in practice and what they mean for provider decision-making, policies and governance, as well as how to balance new duties with the existing equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) policies of HEIs.

We also expected discussion on the character of student expression and culture on campus, looking at best practice for SUs when it comes to engaging with concerns of safety, harm and offence in the context of free speech, and what is needed for wider effective facilitation of open and supportive cultures of discussion at universities.

Further sessions assessed implications of new legislation for the structure of academic debate and curriculum design, examining strategies for ensuring quality in all aspects of course content creation, teaching and research. We also expected discussion on the ramifications of new legislation on wider debate outside higher education settings, as well as broader questions of institutional responsibility around free speech.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Jennifer Cannon, Head of Fostering Good Relations Policy, Equality and Human Rights Commission; Charlotte Corrish, Head of Public Policy, Office of the Independent Adjudicator; Professor Adam Habib, Director, School of Oriental and African Studies; and Smita Jamdar, Partner and Head of Education, Shakespeare Martineau.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• freedom of speech on university campuses: likely implications of the Freedom of Speech Act 2023 for students, staff and society
• impact on HEIs: definition of new duties and compliance with statutory requirements - balancing competing responsibilities - processes for determining legitimate complaints
• campus conduct and culture: understanding the nature and drivers of expression on campus - trends in student views - methods for addressing harassment and discrimination
• free speech complaints: developing systems for addressing concerns in UK universities - proposals for the new OfS complaints scheme and next steps for implementation from August 2024
• academic freedom, teaching and research: curricular design and reading lists - considering implications for quality assurance - impact on academic enquiry and debate
• policy: assessing regulation and freedom of speech in higher education going forward - what is needed from proposed structures - the future for regulation of SUs

This conference assessed the future of postgraduate research in the UK.

It brought policymakers, regulators and stakeholders together to examine the way forward for PGR in light of UKRI’s New Deal for Postgraduate Research, published in September 2023, which outlines aims for widening participation, alongside maintaining the attractiveness and internationally competitive standards of UK PGR.

Sessions in the agenda examined sector responses to the UKRI’s call for input on the New Deal last year, including calls for improvement in supervision and funding structures, as well as flexibility and avenues for employment for those in postgraduate study with concerns raised over the difficulty of advancing careers in research.

It was an opportunity to assess approaches to improving PGR links with industry, in light of government initiatives to encourage the commercialisation of research, outlined in the Autumn Statement and the Government’s response to the Independent Review of University Spin-out Companies in November 2023.

Delegates also discussed further developments relating to PhD and research degree funding and training, including reviews that have taken place across the UK’s research councils.

Further sessions considered priorities and strategic options for maintaining the UK’s internationally competitive standing as a centre for postgraduate study and research, including attracting international talent to the UK.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Professor Christopher Smith, Chief Executive, UKRI Arts and Humanities Research Council; Ewan Nicholas, Senior Policy Advisor, UKRI; and Francesca Long, Head of Training and Talent Development, The Faraday Institution.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• New Deal for PGR: assessing responses to the call for input - key priorities
• funding: finance structures for PGR - increasing the stipend spend for PhD students - investment in doctoral training programmes - changes to the distribution of training grants - role of the Postgraduate Research Funders and Providers Forum
• engagement: approaches to widening participation, including distanced and part-time courses - proposals for PhD flexibility and multi-disciplinary programmes
• support: priorities for students and research departments across the sector - enhancing research supervision and the student experience - increasing the accessibility of research careers - transitioning to the workplace
• partnerships: strengthening relationships between research departments and employers
• wider impact: priorities for the commercialisation of research - embedding research in wider society - attracting international talent - maintaining the UK’s global research standing

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; Ofsted; DBT; DAERA, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DWP; and IPO.