Westminster Higher Education Forum

This conference considered next steps for widening higher education access and participation in the UK, and strategies for improving outcomes for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Sessions in the agenda examined how best to address the perceived participation gap and improve access to university for those from disadvantaged backgrounds, with UUK proposing to set a new target of 70% participation in tertiary education for 25 year-olds by 2040, an increase from the current goal of 49%. The conference also came in light of the Government’s recent announcement of plans to raise maximum tuition fees to £9,535 whilst also implementing an inflation-linked rise in maintenance loans, which was met with overall mixed response from the education sector, with the ASCL warning that the rise may deter students from disadvantaged backgrounds from applying to university.

Stakeholders and policymakers assessed progress on implementing the updated access and participation plans (APPs) mandated by the Office for Students. Areas for discussion include the processes involved, along with challenges and best practice for HEIs meeting requirements, issues around reducing administrative burden, and defining and monitoring the success of strategies.

We expected discussion to bring out best practice and latest strategies for student recruitment, selection, admission and onboarding, looking at increasing diversity and attracting underrepresented groups to higher education, with recent statistics following A-level results day showing that regional disparities in England still exist despite a record-high number of students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds gaining places at university. Delegates also considered strategies for tackling financial barriers, the potential effects of the rise in tuition fees and maintenance loans, drop-out rates, and better supporting students to achieve their potential.

It was also an opportunity to discuss the implementation of requirements for sector-agreed quality practice outlined in QAA’s recently published Quality Code for Higher Education.

Priorities for HEI collaboration with FE and schools were discussed, alongside strategies for improving study and careers guidance and support for students. We expected discussion on the future of technical and vocational routes, including proposals from the Government for a Growth and Skills Levy.

The agenda also looked at the way forward for aligning participation strategies with skills needs. Sessions considered access to non-traditional options, including degree apprenticeships and upskilling. Delegates will also discuss opportunities for mature learners and the future of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement, along with improved provision of part-time, distanced and flexible courses.

Discussion was also expected to draw on UUK’s recent Opportunity, growth and partnership: a blueprint for change report calling for a system-wide effort to increase access and improve student progression into the labour market. Delegates considered recommendations such as a tertiary education opportunity fund, action by universities and government to increase teacher supply, and reinstating maintenance grants for students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Ben Jordan, Director, Strategy, UCAS; Dr Rachel Carr, CEO, IntoUniversity; Dr Omar Khan, CEO, TASO; and Dr Andrew Ross, Head, Widening Access and Participation, University of Bath.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• access and participation in HE: assessing the current landscape and next steps
• APPs: examining the development process - optimising their utility
• addressing barriers: achieving positive outcomes for students - tackling drop-out rates - diversifying student intake - addressing student financial burdens - support into the job market
• collaboration with FE and schools: student information, guidance and support - technical and vocational routes - improving relationships and developing whole-system approaches
• expanding and diversifying routes into HE: new skills and employment policy - meeting local needs - upskilling - mature learners - flexible provision - non-traditional options - LLE rollout
• priorities: improving access to higher education moving forward

All delegates were able to contribute, alongside key policy officials, to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; Department for the Economy, NI; MHCLG; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference examined priorities and next steps for Higher Technical Qualifications (HTQs) in England, including what is currently working for the sector and what could be improved.

It was an opportunity to look at the rollout of new HTQs in September 2024 and ahead to further rollout in 2025 as part of the phased implementation in England, introducing business, health, STEM, advisory and service sector qualifications.

The conference followed the recent launch of Skills England which will be established in phases over the next 9-12 months, with aims to increase collaboration between businesses and the education sector and change the way young people are trained. Delegates looked at priorities for the new body, drawing on its first report Skills England: Driving growth and widening opportunities published in September 2024, as well as for reforming the Apprenticeship Levy to become the Growth and Skills Levy in light of the £40m investment announced in the Budget.

Those attending assessed next steps for HTQs following IfATE’s consultation earlier this year, which sought views on how to strengthen technical skills at levels 4 to 6, and on which HTQs could be eligible for funding under the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE).

Sessions in the agenda examined IfATE’s proposals for a greater range of approval categories, with the aim of accommodating a broader choice of technical qualifications at levels 4 to 6. There was discussion on next steps for shaping inclusive future training programmes, increasing the range of occupational routes, meeting green skill needs and improving employer collaboration to meet learner demand.

Those attending discussed latest thinking on improving the quality of provision and range of courses on offer, and offering more flexible and modular learning in light of IfATE’s consultation on the LLE, as well as the way forward for improving outcomes for both students and employers.

Ways that uptake could be boosted were also considered, following the Skills Commission finding a widespread lack of understanding of HTQs and their distinctiveness from apprenticeships among learners, parents, education providers and employers.

We also expected wider discussion on how to tackle barriers to HTE uptake, including strategies for promoting better awareness, and addressing concerns surrounding perceived financial disincentives for employers and individuals to pursue HTQs as an option due to uncertainty around their value for employability.

The agenda also looked at key issues for employers, and implications for the economy and skills pipeline. Delegates assessed the impact of the new Government’s proposed reforms to the Apprenticeship Levy and options for giving employers greater flexibility in the use of the Levy to include HTQs. Delegates discussed wider post-16 strategy proposals, including the establishment of Skills England body to bring together business, training providers and unions to deliver the Industrial Strategy, and the role of the £300m of funding in the Budget to help young people develop skills in further education.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Peter Myant, Head, Higher Technical Education Strategy and Growth, DfE, Graham Hasting-Evans, CEO, NOCN Group; and report Co-Chair, Higher Technical Qualifications: How to Liberate Employers & Skill Workers for the Future; Imran Tahir, Research Economist, Institute for Fiscal Studies; Alex Hall-Chen, Principal Policy Advisor for Sustainability, Skills, and Employment, Institute of Directors; and Emma Roberts, Director, External Affairs, WorldSkills UK.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; IfATE; DWP; DBT; HMPPS; NAO; ONS; IPO; DFHERIS, ROI; DfE, NI; DESNZ; DSIT; DfC, NI; MOJ; OLS; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed the financial stability, resilience and sustainability of the UK HE sector.

With the recent Government announcement that tuition fees will rise in line with inflation to £9,535 from October next year for new and existing students, it was an opportunity to discuss the impact of this increased income generation on the financial stability of HE institutions.

The conference also followed the publication of updated analysis from the Office for Students, Financial sustainability of higher education providers in England, outlining concerns surrounding university recruitment of both home and international students. The analysis anticipates a net income reduction of £3,445 by 2025-26, with a sector level deficit of -£1,636m, with up to 72% of providers being in deficit, and 40% having low liquidity. Stakeholders and delegates assessrf the impact of these figures on long-term financial planning in HEIs and priorities for sector stability moving forward.

Bringing stakeholders together with policymakers, sessions considered concerns that the increased funding received will be cancelled out by the increase in employer national insurance contributions announced in the recent Budget, and that some universities might not be able to receive the higher rate of tuition fee for existing students due to contractual differences.

Following the Government also announcing it will bring forward wider proposed reforms for the HE sector next year, and with calls from the sector for a more long-term solution to addressing financial challenges, delegates discussed potential opportunities for HE funding changes in next year’s spending review and the future for tuition fees beyond 2025/26.

With the Secretary of State for Education emphasising that increased income generation from tuition fees next year should be used to improve university access and increase efficiencies within HE institutions, delegates exploreed options and strategies for utilising extra income. We also expected discussion on the impact of fee increases on people applying to attend university, with universities expressing concern of rising fees acting as a deterrent to potential applicants, and the role of maintenance loan increases in supporting effected groups to be able to afford to attend university.

The conference also followed the recent announcement that the role of the Office for Students will be refocussed to prioritise the financial stability of the HE sector, alongside delivery of improved quality and outcomes for students. It was an opportunity to examine key issues and the unprecedented challenges facing the sector in the context of the recently published Fit for the Future: Independent Review of the Office for Students, led by Sir David Behan. The report made recommendations for the OfS, Government and HE sector to consider, including on the development of sustainable funding models, transparency, support for at-risk institutions and enhanced financial oversight.

It also came with the publication of University UK’s Blueprint for the future of the HE sector, which argued for a hybrid system to secure the immediate financial future of the sector and over the longer-term. It also calls for reviews of teaching models and university research, greater use of AI, new group structures based on the University of London model and increased collaboration to save costs.

We also expected discussion on implications for financial stability in the HE sector of findings in:

• the Higher Education Statistics Agency’s key financial indicators for 2022/2023 - showing a significant number of HEIs are now in deficit
• HEPI’s Undergraduate fees revisited report, which proposes a 10-point plan to strengthen the system, including introducing a 20-year repayment term on student loans and a minimum student loan repayment of £10 per week after graduation

Delegates assessed what is needed from regulators, government and the sector itself to effectively identify and respond to emerging financial risks, and develop regulatory frameworks that provide clarity on the conditions for intervention and support, as well as options for future funding settlements that work for universities, staff, students and the taxpayer.

Further sessions brought out discussion on next steps for UK HEI business models, and latest developments in wider initiatives aimed at restructuring and diversifying income streams to improve the sector’s resilience, including approaches to strategic business partnerships and the commercialisation of research.

We also expected discussion on further priorities for the sector as HEIs seek to address financial concerns, including:

• student numbers: strategies and best practice for sustaining enrolment levels - impact of increased tuition fees on student recruitment - role of increasing maintenance loans in line with inflation in supporting effected groups to afford university
• UK HE in a global market: maintaining the UK’s competitiveness as an international study destination whilst reducing reliance on international students
• regulation: options for working with government and the regulator to reduce regulatory burdens and develop a future funding settlement
• risk management: establishing an improved early warning system for identifying emerging challenges
• sector collaboration: proactive sharing of intelligence and data between institutions
• economic pressures: mitigating impacts of inflation and wider pressures on operating costs
• HE estates: latest thinking on improving cost-efficiency for estates maintenance and development, and investment to reduce carbon emissions
• future policy: options for long-term funding reform - opportunities for next year’s spending review - future for tuition fees beyond 2025/26

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DfE; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; NAO; DSIT; IPO; GO-Science; Home Office; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined key issues for the future of student accommodation in the UK.

It brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to discuss priorities for policy, and for the higher education sector, students, housing providers and local authorities.

Key areas for discussion included options for policy and stakeholders in addressing concerns surrounding the supply of student accommodation and rising costs, with The Times highlighting a 230,000 student bed shortage in the UK. 

Delegates assessed the potential impact of the recently published Renters’ Rights Bill which aims to offer greater protections to those in rented accommodation, looking at implications for landlords and students, and the supply of privately-rented student housing amid concern that measures in the Bill such as the proposed bans on ‘no fault’ section 21 evictions and fixed term tenancies do not account for the specific nature of student rentals.

Those attending also looked more widely at the student housing market, with latest thinking on implications of increased demand alongside current and emerging market trends in the supply of university-provided accommodation, including halls of residence, and Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA).

The agenda also looked at strategies for mitigating the impact of supply and cost concerns on student experience, as well as the effect on participation in HE and HEI applications.

We expected discussion on progress in implementation of the Student Accommodation Code of Practice, and the potential effect of planning system reform outlined in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill on provision of student accommodation moving forward.

Overall, issues for discussion on the current student housing model and priorities moving forward included:

• supply:
  
  • strategic options for meeting the demand for both privately and HEI-supplied accommodation - reducing the gap between supply and demand - the supply and provision of PBSA
  • addressing the impact of HEI financial pressures on accommodation supply and affordability - options for construction and operation cost reduction - delivering value for money
• standards and best practice:
  
  • progress and impact of the Student Accommodation Code of Practice - university uptake - remaining priorities for improving student housing quality and standards
  • broadening choice - alternative accommodation provision and options - House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) opportunities
• policy: potential impact of proposals in the Renters’ Rights Bill on off-campus, multi-occupancy, privately-rented home supply - implications for the student housing market - regulatory priorities going forward
• student finances: cost of living issues for students related to housing - impact on student access to accommodation away from home and decisions to progress into HE - value for money
• student experience: meeting the needs of different student groups, including international students and those with disabilities - priorities for improving student satisfaction and wellbeing
• collaboration: strengthening government, local authority, HEI and private sector partnerships - improving system efficiency to deliver sustainable accommodation solutions
• housing market: ways in which the demand for student housing is impacting the wider housing market - the way forward for utilising local housing data

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from MHCLG; DHSC; Department for the Economy, NI; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference examined next steps for improving student mental health in universities.

It brought together key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss priorities for student mental health support in HEIs and how to improve existing provision moving forward.

Sessions in the agenda examined the direction of policy under the new Government following the target for all HEIs to have signed up to the University Mental Health Charter Programme by September 2024. Implementation of the renewed MHCP was considered, alongside key areas for research and the way forward for collaboration and sharing best practice to improve mental health at a university and UK-wide level. We also expected discussion on implications for HEIs of provisions in the Mental Health Bill, including giving increased rights and autonomy to users of mental health services.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Jane Harris, Chair, Mental Wellbeing in Higher Education Expert Group; Dr Omar Khan, CEO, Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education; Yeme Onoabhagbe, Interim CEO, Student Minds; Nicola Turner, Senior Fair Access Adviser, UCAS; and Dr Emma Roberts, Head, Law, University of Salford.

Alongside looking at initiatives in individual universities, delegates assessed progress made by the Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce. They also examined key areas for improvement in the context of additional funding, guidance and support being rolled out across the HE sector, and the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health.

The conference brought out latest thinking on addressing factors leading to the rise in mental health conditions among young people in HEIs, including workload pressures, online harms, financial stresses and the aftermath of the pandemic. Discussion explored the potential effects on mental health in HEIs following the Government’s inflation-linked increase of tuition fees and maintenance loans from next year, with a recent Save the Students survey showing 60% of university students reporting that money worries had impacted their mental health. Sessions also explored strategies for supporting the transition into HE, including providing students with the necessary skills to adjust to the new environment.

Delegates considered how variation in the quality of mental health service provision in HEIs can be addressed. They examined best practice in how HE providers are embedding mental health support strategies into their governance structures, including processes for identifying those at risk, providing tailored interventions, and best practice in compassionate communication and case management.

In examining the case for a statutory duty of care for HE students, delegates considered potential implications, looking at strategies for increasing guidance and training for non-specialist staff, and improving information sharing between educational settings, agencies and support services.

There was also a focus on effective partnerships between HEIs, local services and health providers, with latest thinking on practicalities of collaboration and data sharing, and how to further improve multi-agency coordination.

We expected further discussionson on the future direction of policy to improve mental health support, including evaluation of existing frameworks such as Student Minds’ Student Space support service, and Universities UK’s Suicide-Safer Universities programme, alongside closer working between HEIs and the NHS.

Areas for discussion in the agenda included:

• implementing the Mental Health Charter: progress towards targets for HEI participation - challenges in adopting a whole-university approach - benefits and impact of the Charter Programme
• taskforce priorities: findings from the Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce - next steps for enhancing mental health and suicide prevention - implications for HE providers
• suicide prevention strategies: developing guidance to restrict access to means - integrating new policies into university settings - addressing online harms and digital access
• information sharing: overcoming barriers between schools, colleges and universities - exploring methods for data sharing - balancing student privacy with support needs
• funding and resources: allocation and impact of government funding - supporting transitions from school to university - expanding counselling and mental health services
• staff training: enhancing guidance and training for non-specialist staff - promoting mental health awareness among faculty - standardising training practices across the sector
• duty of care: examining the potential for a statutory duty of care - implications for HE providers and students - learning from recent high-profile cases
• embedding support strategies: integrating mental health into university governance - identifying at-risk students - implementing tailored interventions and compassionate communications
• collaboration and partnerships: improving multi-agency coordination - building effective partnerships with local services and health providers - practicalities of collaboration and data sharing
• evaluating existing frameworks: assessing Student Space, Suicide Safer Universities, and NHS-HEI mental health partnerships - identifying areas for improvement - future policy directions

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DHSC; DfE; DAERA, NI; DftE, NI, DoH, NI; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focuseed on the future use of AI in higher education, bringing out latest thinking on maintaining academic integrity, as well as opportunities that the new technology presents for teaching and learning.

It was an opportunity for key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss implications of recent developments, such as the QAA’s Navigating the complexities of the artificial intelligence era in higher education report, which highlighted opportunities for the sector, including increasing accessibility, supporting those with additional learning needs, and improving flexibility and productivity in learning. Delegates also discussed potential challenges AI presents to the sector, such as decreasing the digital divide, guaranteeing accessibility, addressing infrastructure issues within universities and managing integration. Nick Watmough, Quality Enhancement and Standards Specialist, QAA, delivered a keynote address at the seminar.

Delegates considered AI’s impact on student learning, development, creativity and achievement. Strategies for effectively integrating AI into HE were examined, focusing on enhancing teaching methods, staff and student academic relationships, supporting different learning needs, and improving administrative efficiency.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on best practice and the positive potential of increased use of AI, including on academic staff time and university finances in the short-term. Areas for discussion included its use in routine operations, such as application processing, timetabling and providing student support, as well as predictive analytics to optimise utilisation of facilities and teaching staff. Longer-term planning, adaptive learning and assessment systems will also be looked at.

The conference assessed approaches to maintaining academic integrity in the age of AI, including regulatory and institutional measures to deter misuse of AI tools and address academic misconduct. Attendees discussed priorities for developing fair and proportionate guidelines for addressing suspected cases of AI-related misconduct, including the use of AI detection tools, and standardising sanctions.

Sessions considered how HEIs are rethinking assessment strategies in light of generative AI, exploring best practice in assessment design, and updating academic integrity policies and fostering transparent communication between students and staff.

Further discussion was expected on leveraging AI to widen participation in HE and tackle the digital divide, and ensuring equitable access to technological advancements.

The conference also looked at how HEIs can respond swiftly to technological innovations by implementing policies and structures that keep pace with AI developments, as well as key considerations for the sector following confirmation in the Budget of the forthcoming Artificial Intelligence Opportunities Action Plan, which will support the Government in utilising AI opportunities and foster growth.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• ethical AI integration: developing guidelines for responsible use of AI in HE - fostering an ethical culture among staff and students - balancing innovation with academic integrity
• policy development: creating effective institutional policies for AI adoption - aligning with regulatory standards - ensuring consistent implementation across departments
• staff and student training: equipping educators with AI competencies - integrating AI literacy into curricula - promoting awareness of AI’s capabilities and limitations
• assessment methods: re-evaluating assessment strategies with AI in mind - exploring alternative models to traditional assessments - maintaining academic standards amidst technological change
• academic misconduct: detecting and preventing AI-assisted cheating - implementing fair and proportionate sanctions - promoting a culture of honesty and transparency
• equity and access: addressing the digital divide in AI adoption - ensuring all students have access to necessary AI tools - supporting underrepresented and disadvantaged groups
• AI for inclusivity: leveraging AI to support disabled students - personalising learning experiences - enhancing student engagement and outcomes
• data privacy: safeguarding personal data in AI applications - understanding legal and ethical implications - establishing secure data management practices
• sector collaboration: fostering partnerships between institutions, policymakers, and industry - sharing best practice - driving innovation in AI-enhanced education
• future readiness: preparing institutions for ongoing AI advancements - developing agile strategies - anticipating future challenges and opportunities

All delegates were able to contribute, alongside key policy officials, to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from DFHERIS, ROI; Education Scotland; and DAERA, NI.

This conference focused on next steps for growing the UK’s role in international research and R&D collaboration.

It was an opportunity to assess the way forward for increasing UK research capabilities and expanding international partnerships to help meet global challenges.

With innovation cited by the new Government as a key enabler for achieving ambitions for economic growth, alongside a focus on improved relationships with the EU and globally - but set against financial constraints - delegates discussed how these tensions can best be addressed in the context of international research strategy. We also expected discussion on how financial challenges being experienced by HEIs could impact the UK contribution to international research.

Delegates discussed how government and regulators can work with stakeholders to:

• structure longer R&D funding cycles proposed by the Government, stimulate private investment, and improve partnerships with industry
• identify opportunities for support from the National Wealth Fund, the Industrial Strategy and reforms to the planning system
• expand skills in key sectors identified by the Government, such as aerospace, AI, automotive, defence, energy and life sciences

In light of the UK’s re-association with the EU-funded Horizon Europe and Copernicus programmes on the same terms as member states, attendees discussed how to further boost research participation and maximise the benefits of renewed partnerships. They also discussed how the UK can continue to promote its added value as a member and contribute to shaping policy priorities for the next funding programmes.

We expected the conference to bring out latest thinking on identifying and forging new international partnerships, including with the Global South, following the recent G7 Science and Technology Ministerial agreeing shared commitments to strengthen international collaboration and boost research, as well as to move forward R&D cooperation with Africa.

Further areas for discussion included strategies for maintaining the UK’s attractiveness as a research destination, how best to harness the UK’s established research clusters, and options for hosting a new international research facility, as well as attracting global talent and improving researcher mobility while retaining expertise within the UK.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include officials from DBT; DfE; DSIT; UKRI; UKSIN; Defra; Dstl; IPO; HMRC; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DHSC; EA; FCDO; FSA; GO-Science; IPO; UKHSA; UKSA; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference discussed how to improve graduate outcomes and employability in the UK.

Key stakeholders and policymakers examined approaches to ensuring that the range of courses being offered by UK HEIs addresses both skills demands in the UK job market and wider societal needs.

It took place in the context of changing perceptions of the value of different degrees amongst HEIs, students and employers - with the Institute of Student Employers Student Development Survey 2024 finding increasing reports from employers of graduates and apprentices leaving for better pay.

The conference was an opportunity to discuss the direction of policy under the new Government, with commitments to:

• establish Skills England and put in place a guarantee of access to training, an apprenticeship, or support to find work for all 18-21 year-olds
• devolve adult skills funding to Combined Authorities
• improve engagement with employers in the skills system, with the aim of growing the quality of training and employment opportunities

Recruitment priorities for employers were discussed, looking at implications of recent trends in the perception of desirable skills from university courses and ongoing issues surrounding the concept of ‘low value degrees’, and the role of HE courses in addressing skills gaps in the job market moving forward.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on strategies designed to measure degree value and incorporate student input into course content and structures, as well as the potential for new ways of measuring graduate outcomes moving forward.

Those attending also looked at the impact a student’s experience at university has on graduate outcomes, including how universities prepare students with the knowledge, soft skills, and experience necessary to secure employment after graduation.

It was an opportunity to assess the impact of increased focus on employability within curriculum design in recent years on improving graduate employment prospects and influencing student choices. Sessions also considered how to improve the university outcomes of those from disadvantaged backgrounds, through tailoring careers advice, increasing mentoring and networking opportunities, targeting specific groups and partnering with employers.

There was further discussion on strategies for strengthening university careers services and best practice in helping students into employment, including raising awareness of career opportunities and pathways. Delegates considered how the latest iteration of the TEF and the release of LEO data is impacting universities’ decision-making around employability and investment in careers guidance services.

Further sessions considered how best to retain the UK’s attractiveness as a study and work destination for international students, with discussion on employment opportunities for filling labour market skills gaps and contribution to the economy more widely, as well as looking forward to future policy options for graduate visas, in light of the Migration Advisory Committee’s recent recommendation that this visa route remain in place.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from DfE; DHSC; DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DFHERIS, ROI; DPENDR, ROI; GLD; MOD; RAF; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on key developments and next steps for strengthening the relationship between universities and their local communities.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to discuss latest thinking on priority areas in which HEIs can contribute to their communities, strategy and best practice for implementing effective civic roles, and the way forward for measuring the impact of partnerships between local government, businesses and universities.

The conference was also a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss the issues in the context of policy ambitions laid out by the new Government for creating a secure future for higher education.

Delegates discussed latest thinking on areas where the involvement of universities in their communities can have the most beneficial local impact, including outreach and mentoring for SMEs, schools and colleges, and support for employment, communities and regeneration, as well as key sectors such as the creative industries.

Those attending also looked at cost-benefit for universities, examining options for incentivising HEIs to contribute to local growth while reducing unnecessary associated administration and bureaucracy.

It was an opportunity to discuss next steps for the National Civic Impact Accelerator (NCIA) and the Action Learning Programme (ALP), with 12 civic university partnerships aiming to accelerate the local social and economic impact of UK universities. Delegates assessed what has been learnt so far from evidence gathering by NCIA to establish what works, share innovation, and provide universities with the framework and tools to effectively contribute to communities.

The agenda also included discussion on priorities for driving universities’ public and community engagement, and working with the public and third sectors, which was a focus of KEF3, with results for individual universities published in September 2023, as well as the role of HEIs in local innovation and regional regeneration.

Further sessions looked at funding for local HEI research projects, including identifying and securing sources of revenue for long-term regional projects, as well as best practice for applying funds to effectively achieve key outcomes.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Alice Frost, Director, Knowledge Exchange, UKRI; Richard Brabner, Director, ESG, UPP; and Executive Chair, UPP Foundation; Adam Leach, Programme Director, National Civic Impact Accelerator; and Greg Wade, Head, Innovation Policy, Universities UK.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; DLUHC; Defra; DBT; DSIT; Dstl; Department for the Economy, NI; IPO; DAERA, NI; DoH, NI; GO-Science; MOJ; UKHSA; HMPPS; HMRC; Home Office; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.

This conference examined next steps for university spin-outs and licencing deals.

It was a timely opportunity for delegates to consider this and wider issues around commercialisation of academic research as the new parliament begins following the General Election.

Delegates assessed latest thinking and best practice, in light of the government’s response accepting all recommendations from the Independent review of university spin-out companies in November 2023, which included:

• a £20m fund to support the foundation of more spin-out companies based on academic research at UK universities
• standardising and quickening the spin-out creation process
• building upon the TenU University Spin-out Investment Terms Guide by recommending 10-25% university equity for life sciences spin-outs and 10% or less for sectors which are less IP intensive

Those attending also examined timelines for implementing innovation-friendly commercialisation policies, following UKRI’s circular letter in February 2024. The letter outlined their interim approach to streamlining university spin-out development, with measures including the publication of an Addendum for HEIs in spring 2024, and continued collaboration with HESA to improve data sets and information transfer between HEIs and investors.

Delegates considered what best practice looks like in regard to future structuring of spin-outs and the relationship between universities and companies, as well as examining industry imperatives for sustaining funding through the scale-up stage of development. Discussion also considered how the UK can maintain competitiveness in comparison to other countries in this area.

Further sessions explored the future for government funding and how best to utilise increased investment, with discussion on the potential for changes in the political landscape affecting funding allocation, and how university research departments can prepare.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Alice Frost, Director, Knowledge Exchange, Research England; Professor Irene Tracey CBE, FRS, FMedSci, Vice-Chancellor, University of Oxford (pre-recorded presentation); Dr Todd Davey, Associate Partner, University Industry Innovation Network; Dr Mairi Gibbs, Chief Operating Officer, Oxford University Innovation; and Dr Christine Martin, Head, Ventures, Cambridge Enterprise.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• key priorities: implementing recommendations from the Independent Review - moving policy and higher education sector practice forward
• spin-out creation: assessing efficiency and establishing a blueprint for licensing deals - approaches to IP - equity shares - support from the founding institution - reducing bureaucracy to quicken the process
• improving the data pool: future direction for improving data sets around spin-out creation - the process of data collection - CRNs and the vision for a comprehensive database of UK spin-outs
• investment and scaling-up: the role of angel and venture funding in early-stage growth and throughout the scale-up process - overcoming barriers academics face when pursuing commercial interests
• terms between HEIs and innovators: equity stakes in spin-out companies and their impact on further investment - considering what is fair for both parties - examples of effective collaboration
• best practice: standards in the UK and internationally - developing investor-friendly value propositions - assembling strong start-up teams - securing patient capital
• widening participation: increasing the geographic spread of successful spin-outs - encouraging investment beyond the South East of England - examining the role of spin-outs in the levelling up agenda
• diversity: priorities for diversifying spin-out leadership teams - addressing structural barriers for female spin-out founders

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DBT; DfE; Defra; DAERA, NI; DHSC; DSIT; DESNZ; DfT; GO-Science; HMRC; IPO; Department for the Economy, NI; Education Scotland; UKHSA; UKSA; and The Scottish Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.

This conference looked at priorities and best practice for integration of technological advancements into long-term plans by higher education institutions for educational provision and environmental sustainability.

It was an opportunity to discuss key issues at a time of heightened focus on this area of policy in the run up to the General Election.

As HEIs invest in digital infrastructure, delegates considered next steps for the incorporation of digital technology into structures for course design, and key issues for implementation.

Attendees assessed the potential for digital technology and GenAI programmes to facilitate creative teaching and learning models, widen participation in HE, and reduce staff workloads.

Delegates discussed best practice for rollout and use, while retaining quality and academic integrity in all aspects of teaching and learning. It followed DfE’s response to a call for evidence on the role of Generative AI in Education, which highlighted concerns over standards and the potential for aspects of learning, assessment and feedback to be undermined.

Delegates examined opportunities and challenges around staff training and adoption, as well as what students and employers need in the design and delivery of digital courses, with discussion on the effectiveness of digital learning in preparing graduates for the requirements of the labour market moving forward.

The agenda brought out latest thinking on key issues around lecture recording and implications of increased digitisation for teaching staff and their rights, and for the nature of academic work.

Delegates considered digital inequalities and wider policy implications for the expansion of digital education. It came with the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s Digital exclusion 2023 report highlighting the importance of balancing increased investment with plans for digital inclusion.

Sessions looked at further opportunities for supporting strategic national and global policy objectives going forward in areas such as sustainability and reducing inequalities, and developing international collaborative relationships, as well as what can be learned from approaches to the adoption of tech in HE in other countries.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Heidi Fraser-Krauss, Chief Executive Officer, JISC; Mary Curnock Cook, Chair, Dyson Institute and Pearson Education; Sue Bagguley, Head of Business Development and Digital Enterprise Sales, Siemens Digital Industries; and Jack Tasker, Business Engagement Partner, Birmingham Digital Futures, University of Birmingham.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DfE; NCSC; Education Scotland; Department for the Economy, NI; HMPPS; and The Scottish Government.

This conference focused on next steps for the implementation of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE).

Following the Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Act being granted royal assent in September 2023, it was an opportunity to bring policymakers, regulators and stakeholders together to assess the timeline for implementation following the recent DfE announcement that the teaching of courses funded by the LLE will now be delayed until January 2026, and what each stage means for the higher education sector.

Discussion considered:

• developing effective student engagement, the role of the LLE in widening participation in HE and increasing social mobility, and enabling workers to upskill through LLE whilst in employment
• the impact of the LLE allowing those in employment to study modular HE courses
• the eligibility of courses under LLE, as well as the £5m scheme launched by the Government to encourage HEIs to deliver Higher Technical Qualifications (HTQ) in a more flexible manner
• key challenges for the sector in supporting modular learning under LLE, implications for quality of provision, and potential changes to course structure and delivery of qualifications
• collaboration between the Department for Education and the wider sector to ensure effective implementation of LLE and alignment of priorities

Delegates also examined the relationship between LLE and the current funding models for HEI finances and what this will look like in the future, including the suitability of the allotted £37k per student for studies, and the sustainability of this figure moving forward.

There was also discussion on proposed reform to the current fee structure to be proportional to the amount of credits offered over the course of study, and the impact of limiting costs.

Further sessions assessed the student experience studying under LLE, looking at next steps for appealing effectively to mature students, and for utilising the LLE to create pathways for students to continue their studies post-16 and to widen participation in higher education.

We are pleased to have been be able to include keynote sessions with: Karl Anderson, Head of Qualifications Policy, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Kim Eccleston, Head of Strategy & Reform and Delivery Lead for LLE, UCAS; Andy Forbes, Head of Development, ResPublica; and Helena Vine, Lead Policy Officer, England, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; IfATE; DFHERIS, ROI; DBT; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; HMPPS; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focuseed on the future of knowledge exchange in the UK.

Delegates examined the direction, development and use of knowledge exchange metrics, looking at priorities for policy and funding to support the UK’s continued evolution as a centre for knowledge exchange.

The conference followed the release of KEF3 in September 2023, which emphasised the role of commercial collaborations in generating economic returns for university research departments.

Those attending considered steps being taken by educational institutions and funding bodies to improve the quality and quantity of knowledge exchange within and between HEIs.

They discussed:

• KEF3’s current use of metrics for informing its seven perspectives, and its five quintile mode of assessment
• enhancing processes for knowledge exchange within the context of Research England’s 2022-2025 Strategic Delivery Plan, including:
  
  • Research England’s review of knowledge exchange funding, and consultations launched in 2022-2023 regarding best methods for enhancing modes of exchange
  • collaboration between Research England and HESA to expand the national database for spin-out companies

Further sessions assessed approaches for developing innovative knowledge exchange strategies within universities and improving university-business collaboration.

It followed government responses to both the Independent Review of University Spin-out Companies, published by DSIT and HM Treasury in November 2023, and the Research, Development and Innovation Organisational Landscape: Independent Review, led by Sir Paul Nurse.

The Government concurred with recommendations from both reviews on a need to improve mobility between areas of innovation in UK universities, and to maintain Britain’s competitiveness as a centre for international talent and knowledge exchange practices by increasing collaborations with commercial partners.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Ellen Bamford, Head of Knowledge Exchange Data and Evidence, Research England; Tomas Ulrichsen, Director, Policy Evidence Unit for University Commercialisation and Innovation, University of Cambridge; Dan Cook, Deputy Director, Higher Education Statistics Agency; Professor Arlene Holmes-Henderson, Professor of Classics Education and Public Policy, Durham University; and Graeme Dey MSP, Minister for Higher and Further Education, The Scottish Government (pre-recorded contribution).

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• creating impactful knowledge exchange strategies - encouraging innovation and collaboration between HEIs and external partners
• how best to utilise the full breadth of HEI knowledge exchange approaches - improving the targeting of funding and the UK’s framework for knowledge exchange metrics
• assessing results of KEF3 - what can be learned from developing trends - priorities and options for provider inclusion in later iterations
• exploring how the public benefit of knowledge exchange in R&I can be maximised, including for levelling up ambitions

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DLUHC; DSIT; GO-Science; IPO; UKAEA; UKHSA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed priorities and next steps for the development, regulation and provision of degree apprenticeships in England.

It followed the Office for Students recently committing funding to increase the number of degree apprenticeship courses available in HEIs, as part of a wider commitment over the next two years to increase access and expand provision.

Delegates discussed the affordability of the Apprenticeship Levy, amidst concerns that it is being increasingly used to fund degree apprenticeships for older employees, while spending on level 2 and 3 apprenticeships for younger people has fallen.

Delegates also considered the role of degree apprenticeships in social mobility and wider access and participation plans for universities, looking at priorities for improving the diversity of those undertaking degree apprenticeships and outreach to those from underrepresented backgrounds.

Further sessions examined what will be needed to harness opportunities for degree apprenticeships in contributing to levelling up, green skills development and wider policy aims.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Darren Shaw, Head of Community of Practice, Assessment and Assurance, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education; Philippa Alway, Senior Policy Adviser, Apprenticeships and Skills, UCAS; Mandy Crawford-Lee, Chief Executive, University Vocational Awards Council; and Rowan Fisher, Head of Student Experience and Skills Policy, Universities UK.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• progress: learning from areas of success and best practice - key issues - applications and admissions - provision and awarding of degree apprenticeships in England moving forward
• uptake: assessing key trends - priorities for careers guidance and raising awareness - options for expanded HEI offers - the Apprenticeship Levy - improving options for SMEs
• transition: moving from courses at level 2 and 3 and T Levels to degree apprenticeships - enhancing progression pathways
• access: improving student diversity - outreach to underrepresented groups - retention and progression - role in social mobility, upskilling, and regional economies and labour markets
• options for universities: continuing to evolve and grow apprenticeship offers - improving the commercial sustainability of degree apprenticeship courses for universities
• collaboration: moving forward relationships between course providers and employers - best practice in collaborative frameworks
• standards: ensuring overall quality of qualifications being awarded - improving student retention rates - regulatory priorities

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the Cabinet Office; DBT; DfE; DFHERIS, ROI; Department for the Economy, NI; DHSC; DLUHC; DSIT; DWP; GLD; HMRC; Home Office; IfATE; Ofcom; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined the way forward for freedom of speech in higher education institutions in the UK.

It brought together stakeholders, regulators and policymakers to discuss the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, which aims to ensure that universities promote freedom of speech as a fundamental value.

Coming as the Office for Students’ (OfS) conducts a consultation on new guidance for HEIs in fulfilling their free speech duties ahead of implementation this August, delegates assessed implications of the legislation for the HE sector, its staff and students. It was an opportunity to consider the roles of stakeholders and policy in setting and implementing boundaries for discussion in higher education settings, and in society more widely.

The agenda also looked at the potential impact of the OfS new free speech complaints scheme on campus culture, academic freedom, teaching and research, as the OfS consults on the scheme and the future regulation of student unions.

As HEIs prepare for the Act to come into effect, delegates examined implementation of key measures, including the expanded legal obligations of institutions and student unions (SUs) to secure and promote freedom of speech for staff, members and students, as well as visiting speakers.

Delegates discussed the definition of new duties and conditions in practice and what they mean for provider decision-making, policies and governance, as well as how to balance new duties with the existing equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) policies of HEIs.

We also expected discussion on the character of student expression and culture on campus, looking at best practice for SUs when it comes to engaging with concerns of safety, harm and offence in the context of free speech, and what is needed for wider effective facilitation of open and supportive cultures of discussion at universities.

Further sessions assessed implications of new legislation for the structure of academic debate and curriculum design, examining strategies for ensuring quality in all aspects of course content creation, teaching and research. We also expected discussion on the ramifications of new legislation on wider debate outside higher education settings, as well as broader questions of institutional responsibility around free speech.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Jennifer Cannon, Head of Fostering Good Relations Policy, Equality and Human Rights Commission; Charlotte Corrish, Head of Public Policy, Office of the Independent Adjudicator; Professor Adam Habib, Director, School of Oriental and African Studies; and Smita Jamdar, Partner and Head of Education, Shakespeare Martineau.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• freedom of speech on university campuses: likely implications of the Freedom of Speech Act 2023 for students, staff and society
• impact on HEIs: definition of new duties and compliance with statutory requirements - balancing competing responsibilities - processes for determining legitimate complaints
• campus conduct and culture: understanding the nature and drivers of expression on campus - trends in student views - methods for addressing harassment and discrimination
• free speech complaints: developing systems for addressing concerns in UK universities - proposals for the new OfS complaints scheme and next steps for implementation from August 2024
• academic freedom, teaching and research: curricular design and reading lists - considering implications for quality assurance - impact on academic enquiry and debate
• policy: assessing regulation and freedom of speech in higher education going forward - what is needed from proposed structures - the future for regulation of SUs

This conference assessed the future of postgraduate research in the UK.

It brought policymakers, regulators and stakeholders together to examine the way forward for PGR in light of UKRI’s New Deal for Postgraduate Research, published in September 2023, which outlines aims for widening participation, alongside maintaining the attractiveness and internationally competitive standards of UK PGR.

Sessions in the agenda examined sector responses to the UKRI’s call for input on the New Deal last year, including calls for improvement in supervision and funding structures, as well as flexibility and avenues for employment for those in postgraduate study with concerns raised over the difficulty of advancing careers in research.

It was an opportunity to assess approaches to improving PGR links with industry, in light of government initiatives to encourage the commercialisation of research, outlined in the Autumn Statement and the Government’s response to the Independent Review of University Spin-out Companies in November 2023.

Delegates also discussed further developments relating to PhD and research degree funding and training, including reviews that have taken place across the UK’s research councils.

Further sessions considered priorities and strategic options for maintaining the UK’s internationally competitive standing as a centre for postgraduate study and research, including attracting international talent to the UK.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Professor Christopher Smith, Chief Executive, UKRI Arts and Humanities Research Council; Ewan Nicholas, Senior Policy Advisor, UKRI; and Francesca Long, Head of Training and Talent Development, The Faraday Institution.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• New Deal for PGR: assessing responses to the call for input - key priorities
• funding: finance structures for PGR - increasing the stipend spend for PhD students - investment in doctoral training programmes - changes to the distribution of training grants - role of the Postgraduate Research Funders and Providers Forum
• engagement: approaches to widening participation, including distanced and part-time courses - proposals for PhD flexibility and multi-disciplinary programmes
• support: priorities for students and research departments across the sector - enhancing research supervision and the student experience - increasing the accessibility of research careers - transitioning to the workplace
• partnerships: strengthening relationships between research departments and employers
• wider impact: priorities for the commercialisation of research - embedding research in wider society - attracting international talent - maintaining the UK’s global research standing

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; Ofsted; DBT; DAERA, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DWP; and IPO.

This conference focused on the future of international students in the UK higher education system. It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to examine key issues for policy, the HE sector and students themselves.

Delegates assessed current recruitment practices and options for the future in the context of the Government’s International Education Strategy ambition for UK universities to recruit 600,000 international students per year by 2030.

Attendees also considered concerns, including those raised by the House of Lords Industry and Regulators Select Committee, that international student recruitment comes with risks for UK universities.

The conference took place against a backdrop of policy developments around net migration levels, alongside ambitions to maintain and further the UK’s competitiveness as a global teaching and research hub.

Further sessions in the agenda discussed priorities for improving the international student experience and employability post-university, with the Government recently requesting the Migration Advisory Committee to review the graduate visa route to prevent abuse of the system.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Anne-Marie Graham, Chief Executive, UKCISA; Professor Brian Bell, Chair, Migration Advisory Committee; and Lecturer, King’s College London; and Haleema Masud, International Students Policy Advisor, UCAS.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• policy:
  
  • priorities and options for the sector and government moving forward
  • the visa and wider legal framework for international students - impact of new rules on dependents and student visas
  • assessing reform to the processes of applying and relocating to the UK - supporting the UK’s attractiveness and reputation as a study destination
• recruitment: emerging patterns in international student admissions figures for UK HEIs - tailoring strategies to reflect international market trends - examining best practice in other countries
• financial sustainability: the role of international students in UK higher education - issues around potential HE sector dependence on international student fees and alternative options
• international student experience:
  
  • latest thinking on student expectations - the international competitive landscape for student recruitment - how the UK can best meet requirements
  • supporting the transition for international students - creating welcoming and inclusive campus cultures - tackling harassment and isolation - priorities for teaching, learning and support
  • employability and careers: visa changes and immigration rules - internships and work placement opportunities - improving careers information, advice and guidance

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DSIT; DWP; FCDO; Home Office; ICIBI; IPO; MAC; UKVI; and the Welsh Government; as well as parliamentary pass-holders from both Houses of Parliament.

This conference brought together policymakers and stakeholders to discuss the future of the Research Excellence Framework (REF).

It followed the publication of initial decisions on the high-level design of REF 2029, delayed from 2028, following concerns over plans to fully break the link between staff and institutional submissions. The delay also aims to allow universities to consider preparations needed to use HESA data to determine REF volume measures, and give providers more time to rework institutional codes of practice.

Discussion explored the ongoing development of REF 2029 as well as the overall future of the REF, along with the impact of reform on research culture, environments and incentives.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Rebecca Fairbairn, Director of REF, Research England; Rachel Hewitt, Chief Executive, MillionPlus Association for Modern Universities; and Marta Agostinho, Executive Director, EU-LIFE.

Overall sessions in the agenda included discussion on:

• Early reactions to the high-level design of REF 2029:
  
  • Deliberation and implementation: considering practicalities of implementing the framework at both individual provider and wider sector levels
  • Submissions: discussing the split between staff and institutional submissions - changes to the nature of the framework’s administrative burden on research institutions
  • Implications for institutional behaviours: increasing the utility of the REF as a tool to improve research quality and impact - reworking of institutional codes of practice
  • Utilising data: preparations for using Higher Education Statistics Agency data to determine REF volume measures
  • Research culture and incentives: new weightings and their impact on the structure of the UK’s research culture - the potential for research to become more collaborative and interdisciplinary
  • Promoting research integrity: driving the move to open access through a decreased emphasis on individual contributions in favour of a wider departmental focus
  • Considerations for future REF design refinements: exploring concerns that the new REF doesn’t focus adequately on freedom of expression in its discussion of research cultures
• REF in the research landscape:
  
  • Research funding: assessing the appropriateness of the REF as a mechanism to assign research funding - exploring alternative options for more formative assessment
  • Informing national strategy: utilising REF outcomes and results to inform national strategic priorities, identify competitive advantages and provide an evidence base for government policy and planning
  • Performance incentives: enhancing the REF as a tool of national research strategy - examining alignment of the REF with government priorities
  • International principles: latest thinking on European research assessment reform - impact on, and opportunities for, future alignment and collaboration across all levels

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DAERA, NI; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Finance, NI; DfE; DLUHC; DSIT; GO-Science; IPO; POST; UKHSA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on priorities and next steps for supporting students with disabilities in higher education, and improving their educational experience and opportunities for progression beyond university.

It brought together representatives across higher education to examine the way that responsibilities of universities are being reassessed with the backing of regulators and advocacy groups.

Delegates assessed latest research, guidance on best practice, practical next steps, and implications for structures and processes within HEIs.

They also considered how to grow the involvement of those with lived experience of visible and non-visible disabilities in charting the way forward for policy and action.

Those attending discussed priorities for the future work of the Disability in Higher Education Advisory Panel, established by the OfS, in advising HEIs on strategies for tackling barriers affecting the experience of students with disabilities, including in areas such as the accessibility and design of the university estate.

Discussion reflected on issues raised in recent research, including TASO’s What works to reduce equality gaps for disabled students and Disabled Students UK’s Access Insights report, which draws on the findings of the annual National Student Survey.

Those attending also considered varying approaches to addressing longstanding issues. We expected discussion on what might be needed to increase awareness and uptake of the ambitions put forward in the Disabled Student Commitment published by the Disabled Students’ Commission in April 2023 and backed by the Office for Students, including its recommendations that senior champions be placed within the governance team of HEIs, and disability passports be implemented to make it easier for disabled students to access support.

The agenda also looked at preparing students for life after higher education, including priorities for recruitment and careers advice, provisions for ongoing study, and improving opportunities for progression into high-skilled employment and leadership positions.

Further sessions discussed funding support for disabled students following the SLC’s July 2023 announcement of new contracts for changing the student loans service model, aimed at refining and improving the process of applying for the Disabled Students’ Allowance.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Alice Speller, Executive Director, National Association of Disability Practitioners; Mette Anwar-Westander, Founding Director and CEO, Disabled Students UK; and Dr Omar Khan, CEO, Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education.

Overall areas for discussion included:

• engagement: priorities moving forward for enabling the voices of students with disabilities to be heard and taken account of - awareness of the visible and non-visible disability spectrum
• implementation: reducing burdens on affected students and meeting their needs - improving internal processes - better cooperation with outside agencies, including information sharing
• the HE experience: strategies for improving the retention, academic achievement, personal experiences and on-time graduation of disabled students
• research: building and sharing the evidence base for HE institutional change - examining impact on grade performance, funding, societal citizenship and the public profile of the sector
• accountability: legal obligations for university leadership - processes in supporting academic success of students with disabilities
• inclusiveness: establishing proactive and sustained university-wide strategies and best practice - estate accessibility - extracurricular activities, teaching, learning, assessment and accommodation
• progression: easing the transition into university and onward to further study and employment
• funding: implications of changes to financial structuring for disabled students, including the Lifelong Learning Act 2023 and any changes to the Disabled Students Allowance
• regulation: assessing options - monitoring the effectiveness of measures taken

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DHSC; DfE; Department of Education, NI; DWP; Department for the Economy, NI; Ofsted; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed priorities and next steps for UK transnational education.

It took place amidst significant growth in the scale of UK TNE, with Office for Students figures showing that 16% of all students registered at English universities now live abroad.

The conference was an opportunity to consider the OfS’s future approach following it taking over regulatory responsibilities from the Quality Assurance Agency.

Sector stakeholders, policymakers and regulators assessed the way forward for TNE regulation and monitoring, alongside how intervention should be approached when challenges develop, with the OfS warning that poor quality courses taught by universities abroad are ‘bad for business’. Further sessions considered priorities for maintaining the integrity of qualifications awarded by UK HEIs through TNE.

Delegates considered key issues for the quality of provision and for how UK TNE provision is perceived internationally, looking at the experiences of students studying for UK HEI degrees at international campuses.

We expected discussion on tackling access issues for UK providers in priority markets, with the Government’s International Education Strategy: 2023 progress update highlighting its work with organisations such as the British Council.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Dr Janet Ilieva, Founder and Director, Education Insight; and Eduardo Ramos, Director of International and Professional Services, Quality Assurance Agency.

Overall, sessions looked at:

• monitoring the quality of UK TNE provision: maintaining overall standards - approaches to regulation and intervention
• partnership-building: how best to implement a rigorous selection process for overseas partner institutions - priorities for robust management of partnerships
• online provision: improving the delivery of online, distanced and blended learning in TNE settings
• the position of UK TNE in the international market: building confidence in UK TNE - progressing UK competitiveness - exploring growth opportunities and overcoming barriers in key markets
• examining trends in the UK TNE market: including growth in student uptake and the number of institutions awarding qualifications abroad
• the student experience:
  
  • learning from the experiences of students studying at international campuses in comparison to that of students studying within the UK
  • priorities moving forward for enabling the voices of students to be heard and taken account of, informing future provision
  • tackling issues relating to consumer rights for students living overseas, and ensuring overall value for money

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DfE; DBT; FCDO; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on next steps for the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF).

It brought stakeholders together with policymakers to discuss implications of the new framework and exercise, what can be learnt from TEF 2023, as well as the future direction and use of the TEF following the publication of the initial ratings of TEF 2023, alongside 50 previously contested ratings.

Delegates assessed what this year’s distribution of Gold, Silver and Bronze categorisations mean for HEIs and students, considering the impact of new submissions and increased student input on this exercise.

Further sessions explored concerns surrounding the accurate measurement of learning outcomes, with discussion on the present and future scope of TEF assessments.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Graeme Rosenberg, Head of Student Outcomes, Office for Students; and Professor April McMahon, Deputy Chair, TEF Panel 2023; and Vice-President for Teaching, Learning and Students, University of Manchester.

Overall, sessions looked at:

• the new TEF framework:
  
  • exploring the new assessment structure - impact of increased student involvement, including the optional Students’ Union report in the dataset collected by the TEF panel
  • increased emphasis on improving information-sharing in and between HEIs - assessing the impact of key recommendations in the Independent Review on the exercise
• system improvement: tackling challenges with comprehensively assessing learning outcomes - how HEI appeals and the delayed publication of results might impact future iterations of the TEF
• reward categorisations: comparing distribution of reward allocations with those of previous iterations of the TEF - impact of the inclusion of new HEIs to the TEF assessment framework
• remit of TEF assessments: exploring the introduction of the ‘Requires improvement’ categorisation - implications of this categorisation for the reputations of HEIs
• application and future use of the TEF: opportunities for HEIs - impact on student choice and university financial sustainability - the ways in which the exercise is influencing student intake figures
• best practice: looking at quality enhancement outside of England - what can be learned for, and from, the TEF

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the Department of Education, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; HMPPS; UKSA; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed the future for UK international research partnerships, and took place in light of the UK’s new deal to re-join the EU’s Horizon research programme.

It brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to consider priorities for the UK’s international research strategy, including:

• strategies to re-establish relationships with Horizon partners, develop effective partnerships and realise the full potential of re-joining the Horizon programme 
• identifying research areas within which the UK can lead internationally
• the alignment of domestic research funding with international objectives

Speakers were expected to assess the nature and degree of influence the UK can achieve within the Horizon programme, as well as the likely overall effect on quality and quantity of research.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Professor Christopher Smith, Executive Chair, Arts and Humanities Research Council; and International Champion, UK Research and Innovation; and Jonathan Adams, Chief Scientist, ISI; Vice President, Consulting, Clarivate and Visiting Professor, Policy Institute at King’s College, London.

Further sessions will also considered:

• opportunities for research partnerships outside Horizon and with countries outside the EU, and unlocking the potential benefits 
• utilising international research for tackling global challenges, and supporting impact and research capacity in target countries
• identifying and building relationships with emerging partners, and deepening collaboration with the Global South
• further establishing partnerships tentatively set up when UK Horizon membership was uncertain, and the future for these relationships
• attracting EU and global research talent to the UK amidst concern over a potential European brain drain, looking at entry routes, and retaining and supporting international researchers
• supporting university-led international research, maximising impact and research capacity with emerging partners

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DBT; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DfT; DHSC; DSIT; DSTL; EA; FCDO; GO-Science; IPO; OLS; UKHSA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government - as well as parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons.

This conference discussed priorities for ensuring the continuation of academic integrity within higher education in the age of AI.

It was an opportunity for policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to examine both the challenges and opportunities related to AI in educational settings.

The discussion followed the opening of the Department for Education’s call for evidence in June on how generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google Bard are used in education.

Delegates considered AI’s potential impact on student learning, development, creativity and achievement.

They discussed what constitutes academic misconduct in the context of AI, as well as the use of AI as a study aid, and options for regulation and for the response from the HE sector itself.

Further sessions assessed opportunities for HEIs with the use of machine learning and new technology in teaching and assessment, as well as the way forward for potential wider applications in university administration and latest developments of AI in research.

We also expected discussion surrounding the place of AI within academic research, and how it can bring together HEIs to develop improved research methods.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Sonja Bjelobaba, Vice President, European Network for Academic Integrity; and Researcher in Research Ethics, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University; Dr Ailsa Crum, Director of Membership, Quality Enhancement and Standards, Quality Assurance Agency; Dr Paul Sant, Associate Professor and Head of Department of Computer Science, University of Law; and Conrad Wolfram, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Strategic and International Research, Wolfram Research.

We expected further discussion on the place of AI within higher education going forward, including:

• the value of AI: how it can be utilised to address complex learning issues - assessing its potential for tailoring teaching methods to individual students 
• academic integrity in digital assessment: ensuring regulation keeps up with the evolving use of technology and AI - equality and diversity considerations in remote proctoring
• engagement with students: fostering cooperation amongst students - balancing utilising potential with mitigating the risk of misuse
• academic misconduct: the impact of AI on the capacity for cheating in HE - further developing systems of detection - how changes to discipline procedures might enable AI to be embraced as a new tool

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the CMA; DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Education, NI; DfE; DFHERIS, ROI; Education Scotland; GLD; HMRC; Home Office; IPO; and The Scottish Government.

This conference looked at next steps for university spin-outs and licencing deals, and latest thinking and best practice in commercialisation of academic research.

It followed the Government’s acceptance of recommendations in the HM Treasury-sponsored Independent Review of University Spin-Out Companies, and the announcement of plans to inject a further £70m in funding with the aim of fostering more spin-out companies and supporting scale-up. It was an opportunity to discuss priorities for policy, the HE sector and their partners in light of the Review’s recomendations.

Delegates assessed evidence on how performance on deal structuring and commercialisation varies across UK HEIs, looking at examples of best practice from both within the UK and internationally, and the role that the university sector, innovators, investors and the Government can play in driving growth.

Sessions looked at success factors for the structuring of spin-outs and strategies for building sustainable and productive relationships between universities, innovators, business partners and co-investors, including benchmarks and factors affecting equity stakes that universities take within spin-outs.

Further sessions focused on the barriers academics face with regard to commercial interests, and the way forward for enabling technology transfer between research centres and their partners.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Robin Polding, Research Commercialisation Policy Lead, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; and Alice Frost, Director of Knowledge Exchange, Research England.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• the Independent Review: what is being learned for moving policy and higher education sector practice forward
• Autumn Statement 2023: the place and role of spin-outs in accelerating growth
• spin-out processes: efficiency and reducing bureaucracy - support from the founding institution - key factors for creating mutual benefit - licensing deals and key IP considerations - equity shares
• investment: the role of angel and venture funding in early-stage growth of spin-outs - options for addressing barriers academics face when pursuing commercial interests
• terms between HEIs and innovators: equity stakes in spin-out companies and their impact on further investment - assessing and agreeing fair value for both universities and their innovators
• investment and structures: the role of spin-off partners in de-risking proposals to attract investment - developing value propositions - assembling strong start-up teams - securing patient capital
• widening participation: diversifying spin-out leadership - increasing the geographic spread of successful spin-outs - encouraging investment beyond the South East - role in levelling up

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DBT; Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; DESNZ; DHSC; DLUHC; DSIT; FCDO; GLD; GO-Science; HMRC; IPO; MHRA; OLS; UKHSA; UKRI; UKSA; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to consider the long-term funding model and financial sustainability of the higher education sector in England.

It followed the House of Lords Industry and Regulators Committee inquiry into the role of the Office for Students (OfS), which called on the Government to review university funding to allow institutions to plan for the long-term and set sustainable funding and delivery models.

With the Committee suggesting that the Government and OfS were not acting on financial concerns surrounding some universities, delegates looked at issues related to the complexity of the current funding model for HEIs following changes to the student loan system implemented in August 2023.

Further sessions assessed alternative options, with calls for reform including the lifting of the current cap on tuition fees as Universities UK conducts a consultation on the future of higher education funding.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Professor Jenny Higham, Policy Lead for Funding, Universities UK; Professor George Boyne, Principal and Vice-Chancellor, University of Aberdeen; Professor Karen Holford, Chief Executive and Vice-Chancellor, Cranfield University; Professor Christopher Millward, School of Education, Professor of Practice in Education Policy, University of Birmingham; and Roberta Malee Bassett, Global Lead for Tertiary Education and Senior Education Specialist, the World Bank.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• financial sustainability: assessing the current funding model - how universities are adapting to the current climate - medium and long-term risks to the stability of the sector - improving resilience
• tuition fees: options for future funding models following concern surrounding the decline in real-time value of tuition fees - considering support for students
• spending and university performance: meeting the academic needs of students - identifying potential future revenue sources - options for increasing financial support 
• overseas students: understanding universities’ reliance on overseas students - strategies to diversify international student recruitment - long-term impacts for the sector
• research funding:
  
  • the efficiency of the application process universities use in order to be awarded financial backing - assessing the efficacy of current spending
  • the suitability of long-term programmes aiming to support research within UK universities, including the impact of the UK re-joining the Horizon funding programme from January 2024 
• private investment in university research: incentives and improving confidence to boost private funding - priorities for continued engagement between businesses and publicly-funded institutions
• policy: priorities for stabilising HE sector finance moving forward - options for reform and regulation

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DAERA, NI; DBT; Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DSIT; Home Office; NAO; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference focused on provision of mental health support for students in higher education.

With DfE setting the target for all universities to sign up to Student Minds’ University Mental Health Charter Programme by September 2024, the conference brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to discuss the development of a whole-university approach to improving student mental health.

The conference was an opportunity to examine key issues against the backdrop of a range of significant initiatives and developments, including:

• the allocation of £15m for student mental health provision from the Office for Students, including additional support for students in their transition to university
• the Government’s commitment to establish a national review of university student suicides
• the creation of the Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce, which will deliver a plan to better identify at-risk students by May 2024
• a University Student Commitment on sensitively dealing with disciplinary issues, and targets for HEIs to improve processes

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Professor Edward Peck, Higher Education Student Support Champion, Department for Education; Chair, Higher Education Mental Health Implementation Taskforce; and Vice-Chancellor, Nottingham Trent University; Dr Gareth Hughes, Charter Content Development Lead and Psychoeducation Lead, Student Minds; Dr Holly Brown, Policy Advisor, UCAS; and Dr Omar Khan, Chief Executive, Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education.

Key areas for discussion included:

• the University Mental Health Charter Programme: implementation priorities - achieving potential benefits of bringing institutions together to improve mental health at a university-wide level
• preparing students: support for transition into higher education - strategies for schools, colleges and universities to provide the skill sets needed by students to adjust into the HEI environment
• those most in need: identification of at-risk students - provision of effective mental health and wellbeing services - suicide prevention - provision of timely and compassionate support
• duty of care: options for an HEI statutory requirement - potential implications for both students and universities - issues related to GDPR and student confidentiality requirements
• collaboration: developing effective partnerships between HEIs, local services and health providers - practicalities for collaboration and data sharing
• cross-sector improvement: strategies for enabling sharing and learning from best practice - tackling variation of provision across universities

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DoH, NI; IfATE; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed priorities for the future of student accommodation in higher education.

It brought together policymakers, regulators and stakeholders to assess key current and emerging issues against the backdrop of the Renters (Reform) Bill, looking at:

• the supply of university-provided accommodation, including halls of residence
• the role of Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA) in meeting sustained, increased demand for student accommodation
• the supply and choice of private multi-occupancy rented houses for returning students, and ways in which landlords can be incentivised to stay in the student housing market

We also expected discussion on the student experience with regard to both access and occupancy, as well as on affordability in light of concerns surrounding the cost of living.

Further sessions considered the sustainability of the current student housing model, with discussion on:

• supply: meeting the demands of increasing student numbers year on year - strategies that HEIs can engage to reduce the gap between supply and demand - the provision of PBSA
• legislation: the likely impact of the Renters (Reform) Bill on the supply of off-campus, multi-occupancy, privately rented homes - implications for the student housing market
• student finances: cost of living issues for students - impact on student access to accommodation away from home and decisions to progress into HE - value for money
• student experience: university-provided and privately rented accommodation - meeting the needs of different student groups, including international students and those with disabilities
• standards and best practice: improving system efficiency and collaboration between HEIs, local government and housing sector partners - developing the Student Accommodation Code of Practice

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Ben Jordan, Head of Policy, UCAS; Victoria Goddard, Partner and Head of Universities & HE, Pinsent Masons; Councillor Jay Hayes, Portfolio Holder for Housing, Nottingham City Council; Ben Beadle, Chief Executive, National Residential Landlords Association; and Jenny Shaw, Higher Education External Engagement Director, Unite Group.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DLUHC; The Scottish Government, and the Welsh Government - as well as parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons.

This conference brought together stakeholders, regulators and policymakers to examine the next steps for addressing drug use in higher education.

It was timed to follow the launch of the second phase of work from the UUK’s drug-use taskforce, expected to include new guidance and a sector framework encompassing supply and demand reduction, support, treatment and recovery.

We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Professor Nic Beech, Vice-Chancellor, Middlesex University London; and Chair, Drug-Use Taskforce, Universities UK.

The conference was a timely opportunity to assess the design of the new sector framework, alongside the practicalities of implementation across institutions and the sector as a whole.

Delegates examined provider drug policies and strategies in light of new guidance, including developing contextualised KPIs and targets, and partnering with outside stakeholders across health, law enforcement and local authorities to effectively address their own drugs landscape.

Overall, sessions in the agenda included:

• policy development: latest on the higher education sector framework to address student drug use in the UK - supply, demand and harm reduction
• implementation: developing policies, objectives and KPIs - student involvement - working with partners - priorities for reducing harms - disciplinary procedures - measuring outcomes
• performance enhancing drugs: frameworks and policies - understanding root causes - support for students - addressing dependency - sanctions - employment and academic consequences
• tackling drugs supply in HE: developing partnerships - disrupting criminal supply chains - balancing sanctions and harm reduction policies - priorities for safeguarding and duty of care
• wider role of universities: opportunities for sector involvement in developing and informing national strategy and policy

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the DfE; DHSC; Home Office; NAO; and Ofcom.

This conference brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine the development and implementation of the Lifelong Loan Entitlement.

It followed the Government’s consultation response and came as the Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill was progressing through Parliament.

The conference was an opportunity to explore the measures and decisions set out in the consultation outcome, and to consider the development of frameworks and regulation to support the implementation and uptake of the entitlement.

Sessions explored the impact of flexible learning on careers information, advice and guidance, and how careers education and advice can adapt to inform both young people and adults on the new routes, pathways and qualifications available.

Attendees also considered the priorities for proposed personal loan accounts and dashboards, including how these might be linked into the applications, admissions and careers systems.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with Tom Lee, Deputy Director, Lifelong Loan Entitlement, Department for Education; Marius Ostrowski, Senior Policy Researcher, ResPublica; Kim Eccleston, Head of Strategy and Reform & Delivery Lead for LLE, UCAS; and David Morgan, Chief Executive, Career Development Institute.

Overall, sessions in the agenda included:

• policy and regulation: developments and priorities for the Lifelong Loan Entitlement
• implementation issues: regulatory reform and burden - credit definition and transfer schemes - sharing and monitoring student data and outcomes - new regulatory categories and requirements
• guidance and application routes: reform and provision of CIAG for students - options for loan dashboards and accounts - increasing awareness of opportunities and pathways
• modular courses: training and upskilling opportunities - course design and delivery - cost to providers - assessing prior knowledge, quality, outcomes and metrics - meeting employer needs

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from Defra; Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DESNZ; DLUHC; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference considered next steps for reform of the higher education admissions system in the UK.

It followed the publication of the Future of Undergraduate Admissions by UCAS in January, which outlined five steps UCAS is taking to reform the undergraduate admissions process, including proposals to adapt the free text personal statement on applications into a series of questions, as well as references, grades on entry, personalisation, and widening access and participation.

We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Clare Marchant, Chief Executive, UCAS, on the priorities for UCAS.

Sessions also looked at the implementation of the self-regulatory Fair admissions code of practice, developed by UUK and GuildHE last year, which sets the behaviours for universities to improve fairness and transparency in the admissions system while maintaining high academic standards.

Overall, discussion looked at:

• priorities for reform: implementation of key UCAS proposals for the admissions system
• applications: ways to increase the personalisation of applications - how students can make best use of changes - increasing the overall confidence in and quality of the admissions process
• impact on staff: implications of reforming personal statements for university admissions teams and decisions - priorities for schools in assisting the applications process
• student support: next steps for applicant information and outreach - considering fair recruitment practices - the future of unconditional offers and other incentives
• contextual offers: improving the reliability of offers made to prospective students
• code of practice: implementation - supporting fairness and transparency in decisions - developing the use of contextual factors in admissions - building reliability into admissions processes
• inclusion and diversity: how to ensure broader student groups are considered in the reform process - improving the process for disadvantaged students
• international students: assessing and taking into account the needs of international students - aligning the admissions process so that it brings in the perspective of the devolved nations

The conference was an opportunity for the stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the DBT; DfE; Department for the Economy, NI; Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science, ROI; and the Welsh Government.